Anonymous wrote:It doesn't sound like there's any specific weakness or reason for the rejection, unless the work samples the school submitted were sloppy or otherwise bad. Sometimes, the admissions decisions just don't make sense to anyone. Reapply next year with good work samples and a good parent questionnaire. Make sure you don't say something offputting to the committee members in the questionnaire. Hopefully, the process will work out for you next time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The CogAT score was not the reason your kid was rejected. Taking it again will do nothing to help your case and may perhaps harm it if the new scores are lower.
It's more likely that your kid was rejected because the work samples were bad, the parent questionnaire didn't show them what they wanted to see, iready/DRA scores weren't high, or you just had bad luck with the panel who reviewed your kid.
The FCPS system is really dumb. A kid with a 99th percentile CogAT score and a good GBRS should be admitted.
Where do you get the DRA from?
They don’t use DRA anymore. In the application packet, was your child listed as having strengths in reading and/or math ?
Strength in reading checked. Do they weigh the iready heavily? 92 R, 93 M.
Those are solid iready scores.
What was cogat quantitative score? Are you at high SES school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The CogAT score was not the reason your kid was rejected. Taking it again will do nothing to help your case and may perhaps harm it if the new scores are lower.
It's more likely that your kid was rejected because the work samples were bad, the parent questionnaire didn't show them what they wanted to see, iready/DRA scores weren't high, or you just had bad luck with the panel who reviewed your kid.
The FCPS system is really dumb. A kid with a 99th percentile CogAT score and a good GBRS should be admitted.
Where do you get the DRA from?
They don’t use DRA anymore. In the application packet, was your child listed as having strengths in reading and/or math ?
Strength in reading checked. Do they weigh the iready heavily? 92 R, 93 M.
Those are solid iready scores.
What was cogat quantitative score? Are you at high SES school?
What does 92 R 93 M in iReady mean? Are you referring to percentiles? I think iReady scores should be 400+. If percentiles, then those iReady aren't that great if you're in the Langley/Mclean pyramids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The CogAT score was not the reason your kid was rejected. Taking it again will do nothing to help your case and may perhaps harm it if the new scores are lower.
It's more likely that your kid was rejected because the work samples were bad, the parent questionnaire didn't show them what they wanted to see, iready/DRA scores weren't high, or you just had bad luck with the panel who reviewed your kid.
The FCPS system is really dumb. A kid with a 99th percentile CogAT score and a good GBRS should be admitted.
Where do you get the DRA from?
They don’t use DRA anymore. In the application packet, was your child listed as having strengths in reading and/or math ?
Strength in reading checked. Do they weigh the iready heavily? 92 R, 93 M.
Those are solid iready scores.
What was cogat quantitative score? Are you at high SES school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The CogAT score was not the reason your kid was rejected. Taking it again will do nothing to help your case and may perhaps harm it if the new scores are lower.
It's more likely that your kid was rejected because the work samples were bad, the parent questionnaire didn't show them what they wanted to see, iready/DRA scores weren't high, or you just had bad luck with the panel who reviewed your kid.
The FCPS system is really dumb. A kid with a 99th percentile CogAT score and a good GBRS should be admitted.
Where do you get the DRA from?
They don’t use DRA anymore. In the application packet, was your child listed as having strengths in reading and/or math ?
Strength in reading checked. Do they weigh the iready heavily? 92 R, 93 M.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The CogAT score was not the reason your kid was rejected. Taking it again will do nothing to help your case and may perhaps harm it if the new scores are lower.
It's more likely that your kid was rejected because the work samples were bad, the parent questionnaire didn't show them what they wanted to see, iready/DRA scores weren't high, or you just had bad luck with the panel who reviewed your kid.
The FCPS system is really dumb. A kid with a 99th percentile CogAT score and a good GBRS should be admitted.
Where do you get the DRA from?
They don’t use DRA anymore. In the application packet, was your child listed as having strengths in reading and/or math ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The CogAT score was not the reason your kid was rejected. Taking it again will do nothing to help your case and may perhaps harm it if the new scores are lower.
It's more likely that your kid was rejected because the work samples were bad, the parent questionnaire didn't show them what they wanted to see, iready/DRA scores weren't high, or you just had bad luck with the panel who reviewed your kid.
The FCPS system is really dumb. A kid with a 99th percentile CogAT score and a good GBRS should be admitted.
Where do you get the DRA from?
Anonymous wrote:The CogAT score was not the reason your kid was rejected. Taking it again will do nothing to help your case and may perhaps harm it if the new scores are lower.
It's more likely that your kid was rejected because the work samples were bad, the parent questionnaire didn't show them what they wanted to see, iready/DRA scores weren't high, or you just had bad luck with the panel who reviewed your kid.
The FCPS system is really dumb. A kid with a 99th percentile CogAT score and a good GBRS should be admitted.