Anonymous wrote:I'm a PGCPS teacher. Our elementary students use computer programs often and all state testing is done online Grade 3+. Many district tests are online, and some are adaptive. If your student doesn't participate in all the on-line testing, they will have to be sent elsewhere for all the test times, and then do testing one on one with a teacher using paper and pencil I guess? It's not like they just won't test your child. It will have to happen in person, though. So your child will be pulled out quite a bit from instruction for that testing. I know the official party line is that testing is brief and doesn't take up much time, but in reality testing takes up a LOT of time.
So why does PGPCS make it an option and again, is there a detailed plan available for how much technology is used for lower grades? Are you aware that PCGCS has this as an option for enrollment?
I just want to know how much of the instructional time is spent on screens for each age group because the computer/tech intrusion is mostly a money grab, which is fine, but I don't think it's healthy for 40% of 7-year-olds educational time to be using just any technology. Smart Boards- great! Library media- awesome! Individual computers where access is not controlled nor monitored- meh.
As a teacher, I am sure you understand where someone might question the fact that all technology is lumped in together when all technology is not equal- either in its educational benefit or addictive quality. Sure, I learned typing on a computer and played Oregon Trail but it was a class, not a feature. If screens are being used constantly then I will have to limit home use even more than I planned.