Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Concrete is expensive. It has terrible ecological impact. It's not very insulating, so you'd still have to insulate it, so the walls would have to be very thick.
A properly built wood house has few problems.
Not true at all. Concrete homes are way better insulated than homes built with wood and walls. You will save as much as 30% in energy in a concrete home.
So tell us, oh building science master, what is the typical wall r-value for a concrete house? And what is code minimum in the US?
Anonymous wrote:concrete walls have an r value of around .1 per inch, so basically a thermal conductive highway.
Anonymous wrote:When you say concrete, do you mean brick? Most homes in Europe are built out of bricks, even the cheaper new builds. It blows my mind to see bits of 2 x 4 thrown up on new housing developments over here and then the for sale sign saying ‘starting at the low 900’s’ !! As if I’m paying $900k for a house made out of wood. No f-ing way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Concrete is expensive. It has terrible ecological impact. It's not very insulating, so you'd still have to insulate it, so the walls would have to be very thick.
A properly built wood house has few problems.
Not true at all. Concrete homes are way better insulated than homes built with wood and walls. You will save as much as 30% in energy in a concrete home.
Anonymous wrote:When you say concrete, do you mean brick? Most homes in Europe are built out of bricks, even the cheaper new builds. It blows my mind to see bits of 2 x 4 thrown up on new housing developments over here and then the for sale sign saying ‘starting at the low 900’s’ !! As if I’m paying $900k for a house made out of wood. No f-ing way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Concrete is expensive. It has terrible ecological impact. It's not very insulating, so you'd still have to insulate it, so the walls would have to be very thick.
A properly built wood house has few problems.
Not true at all. Concrete homes are way better insulated than homes built with wood and walls. You will save as much as 30% in energy in a concrete home. Traditional homes have to be constantly repaired due to rot, insects, and from weathering. How ecologically green is having to replace a traditional roof multiple times over the life of a home, vs a concrete home that may never need a new roof? There are just a lot of problems with traditional homes you don’t have with concrete.
Anonymous wrote:Concrete is expensive. It has terrible ecological impact. It's not very insulating, so you'd still have to insulate it, so the walls would have to be very thick.
A properly built wood house has few problems.