Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know!! Let’s impeach all but the democrats and fill the entire SC with democrats because that’s the goal here. I don’t think y’all know how transparent and gullible you all are.
Point out the ethics lapses and corruption of "left" justices and we can talk.
DP. OK.
It turns out Justice Sotomayor left six free or reimbursed excursions off her 2016 financial disclosure report, which she amendment last year but was only released to the public (i.e., us) today.
In 2020, via public records request, we discovered that Sotomayor’s trip to Rhode Island to give the URI commencement address included a free flight and hotel, which under federal law must be reported in an annual disclosure report. It wasn’t. Today we learned that her 2016 trips to universities in Illinois, New Jersey, Alaska, Wisconsin and Minnesota were also omitted.
Even with all these trips being to public schools and for educational talks, the omissions show the the court must take its disclosure responsibilities more seriously.
https://fixthecourt.com/2022/06/justice-sotomayor-amends-financial-disclosure-include-six-free-trips-previously-omitted/
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s nominee financial disclosure from March 2022 reveals she “inadvertently omitted” consulting income her spouse “periodically receives from consulting on medical malpractice cases” on previous reports.
“Jackson only told us her husband made money in ‘legal malpractice consulting,’ which is about as opaque as you can get,” he said. “Where did this money come from? Who are his clients? Did these clients have any matter before Jackson while she served as a federal judge for the prior decade? Jackson left out this required information in her disclosures for nearly 10 years, and she stated in her 2022 confirmation disclosures that she’d amend them later. Where are the amendments?”
Jackson not only omitted details about her husband’s work, she also excluded details about her own positions.
“My 2014 and 2016 annual reports inadvertently omitted reimbursements from: (i) the University of California, Berkeley School of Law for expenses to attend a panel discussion in October 2014, and (ii) the Aspen Institute for expenses to attend a Justice and Society seminar in July 2016,” the disclosure states. “In addition, my 2014 annual report inadvertently omitted my salary of $1,765 from George Washington University for teaching a Federal Sentencing Seminar.”
https://dailycaller.com/2023/04/20/double-standard-ketanji-brown-jackson-financial-disclosure-supreme-court-clarence-thomas-ethics/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know!! Let’s impeach all but the democrats and fill the entire SC with democrats because that’s the goal here. I don’t think y’all know how transparent and gullible you all are.
Point out the ethics lapses and corruption of "left" justices and we can talk.
DP. OK.
It turns out Justice Sotomayor left six free or reimbursed excursions off her 2016 financial disclosure report, which she amendment last year but was only released to the public (i.e., us) today.
In 2020, via public records request, we discovered that Sotomayor’s trip to Rhode Island to give the URI commencement address included a free flight and hotel, which under federal law must be reported in an annual disclosure report. It wasn’t. Today we learned that her 2016 trips to universities in Illinois, New Jersey, Alaska, Wisconsin and Minnesota were also omitted.
Even with all these trips being to public schools and for educational talks, the omissions show the the court must take its disclosure responsibilities more seriously.
https://fixthecourt.com/2022/06/justice-sotomayor-amends-financial-disclosure-include-six-free-trips-previously-omitted/
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s nominee financial disclosure from March 2022 reveals she “inadvertently omitted” consulting income her spouse “periodically receives from consulting on medical malpractice cases” on previous reports.
“Jackson only told us her husband made money in ‘legal malpractice consulting,’ which is about as opaque as you can get,” he said. “Where did this money come from? Who are his clients? Did these clients have any matter before Jackson while she served as a federal judge for the prior decade? Jackson left out this required information in her disclosures for nearly 10 years, and she stated in her 2022 confirmation disclosures that she’d amend them later. Where are the amendments?”
Jackson not only omitted details about her husband’s work, she also excluded details about her own positions.
“My 2014 and 2016 annual reports inadvertently omitted reimbursements from: (i) the University of California, Berkeley School of Law for expenses to attend a panel discussion in October 2014, and (ii) the Aspen Institute for expenses to attend a Justice and Society seminar in July 2016,” the disclosure states. “In addition, my 2014 annual report inadvertently omitted my salary of $1,765 from George Washington University for teaching a Federal Sentencing Seminar.”
https://dailycaller.com/2023/04/20/double-standard-ketanji-brown-jackson-financial-disclosure-supreme-court-clarence-thomas-ethics/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know!! Let’s impeach all but the democrats and fill the entire SC with democrats because that’s the goal here. I don’t think y’all know how transparent and gullible you all are.
Point out the ethics lapses and corruption of "left" justices and we can talk.
Please. I can actually predict the next ‘scandal’. Same sources, same BS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know!! Let’s impeach all but the democrats and fill the entire SC with democrats because that’s the goal here. I don’t think y’all know how transparent and gullible you all are.
Point out the ethics lapses and corruption of "left" justices and we can talk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know!! Let’s impeach all but the democrats and fill the entire SC with democrats because that’s the goal here. I don’t think y’all know how transparent and gullible you all are.
Point out the ethics lapses and corruption of "left" justices and we can talk.
It turns out Justice Sotomayor left six free or reimbursed excursions off her 2016 financial disclosure report, which she amendment last year but was only released to the public (i.e., us) today.
In 2020, via public records request, we discovered that Sotomayor’s trip to Rhode Island to give the URI commencement address included a free flight and hotel, which under federal law must be reported in an annual disclosure report. It wasn’t. Today we learned that her 2016 trips to universities in Illinois, New Jersey, Alaska, Wisconsin and Minnesota were also omitted.
Even with all these trips being to public schools and for educational talks, the omissions show the the court must take its disclosure responsibilities more seriously.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s nominee financial disclosure from March 2022 reveals she “inadvertently omitted” consulting income her spouse “periodically receives from consulting on medical malpractice cases” on previous reports.
“Jackson only told us her husband made money in ‘legal malpractice consulting,’ which is about as opaque as you can get,” he said. “Where did this money come from? Who are his clients? Did these clients have any matter before Jackson while she served as a federal judge for the prior decade? Jackson left out this required information in her disclosures for nearly 10 years, and she stated in her 2022 confirmation disclosures that she’d amend them later. Where are the amendments?”
Jackson not only omitted details about her husband’s work, she also excluded details about her own positions.
“My 2014 and 2016 annual reports inadvertently omitted reimbursements from: (i) the University of California, Berkeley School of Law for expenses to attend a panel discussion in October 2014, and (ii) the Aspen Institute for expenses to attend a Justice and Society seminar in July 2016,” the disclosure states. “In addition, my 2014 annual report inadvertently omitted my salary of $1,765 from George Washington University for teaching a Federal Sentencing Seminar.”
Anonymous wrote:I know!! Let’s impeach all but the democrats and fill the entire SC with democrats because that’s the goal here. I don’t think y’all know how transparent and gullible you all are.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone knew Roberts’ wife was doing this - at the time it was actually preferred to her former job which was as an attorney at one of the firms which has a ton of business before the court. I’m liberal AF and all over all of the other SCOTUS corruption threads but I’m not sure this is a BFD. She should be able to work somewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone knew Roberts’ wife was doing this - at the time it was actually preferred to her former job which was as an attorney at one of the firms which has a ton of business before the court. I’m liberal AF and all over all of the other SCOTUS corruption threads but I’m not sure this is a BFD. She should be able to work somewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone knew Roberts’ wife was doing this - at the time it was actually preferred to her former job which was as an attorney at one of the firms which has a ton of business before the court. I’m liberal AF and all over all of the other SCOTUS corruption threads but I’m not sure this is a BFD. She should be able to work somewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone knew Roberts’ wife was doing this - at the time it was actually preferred to her former job which was as an attorney at one of the firms which has a ton of business before the court. I’m liberal AF and all over all of the other SCOTUS corruption threads but I’m not sure this is a BFD. She should be able to work somewhere.