Anonymous wrote:What are you prattling on about? Sounds like your kid can’t read and you think that’s the school’s fault. Good luck to you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I met three Kindergartners from three different schools and none of them can read beyond CVC words, more than three-quarters of the way into the year. Their parents say they get a lot of Chromebook time. WTF? I thought these schools were supposed to be well-funded and good.
Cats out of the bag! Take a closer look at the current reading curriculum used in the county (being replaced next year). I’ve got a 5th grader who suffered the fate of it. I’ve been warned about it from his previous teachers to his current tutor who all teach in LCPS. Don’t even get me started about the reliance and daily screen time on his Chromebok.
The county is a mess! We over out here and have put two kids through elementary and have seen so many families move to get out of the county. It’s a shame! We were all sold a bill of goods about how great the education here is. It is not.
Anonymous wrote:It’s not the teacher’s fault if kids show up to K not knowing letter names and sounds, and the amount of kids that describes has gone up exponentially since Covid. I know for a fact that the amount of PALS and reading intervention these kids get is insane.
Most kids in affluent elementary schools that went to good preschools are far beyond CVC by the end of K. Your sample size of three says more about the families than the school.
Anonymous wrote:That’s developmentally appropriate
Anonymous wrote:OP, you do know that lots of places (including FCPS) used or use Lucy Calkins right? Yes they are all moving away from it now but LCPS was hardly unique.
Anonymous wrote:I met three Kindergartners from three different schools and none of them can read beyond CVC words, more than three-quarters of the way into the year. Their parents say they get a lot of Chromebook time. WTF? I thought these schools were supposed to be well-funded and good.