Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it wasn’t a pothole the city should have partitioned it off to indicate.
They shouldn't have to. It was a perfectly rectangular hole. Clearly manmade, not a pothole. It wasn't even that deep.
Any hole in the road that is made for work should have something identifying to drivers. Don’t be obtuse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it wasn’t a pothole the city should have partitioned it off to indicate.
They shouldn't have to. It was a perfectly rectangular hole. Clearly manmade, not a pothole. It wasn't even that deep.
Any hole in the road that is made for work should have something identifying to drivers. Don’t be obtuse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it wasn’t a pothole the city should have partitioned it off to indicate.
They shouldn't have to. It was a perfectly rectangular hole. Clearly manmade, not a pothole. It wasn't even that deep.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it wasn’t a pothole the city should have partitioned it off to indicate.
They shouldn't have to. It was a perfectly rectangular hole. Clearly manmade, not a pothole. It wasn't even that deep.
Anonymous wrote:More like Tarminator.
Anonymous wrote:If it wasn’t a pothole the city should have partitioned it off to indicate.
Anonymous wrote:"The road to hell paved with good intentions" - lol