Sorry for the double post. Really, though, if your kid gets rejected from AAP, but you think they belong, these are basically the only approaches you can take:
If test scores and GBRS are high, just continue appealing and reapplying. Eventually your kid will get in.
If the test scores are high but GBRS is low, try to figure out what's happening in the classroom. It's possible that the GBRS in 3rd will magically become strong, but it's also possible that your child isn't demonstrating much of anything in the classroom.
If the GBRS is high, but the test scores are much lower than you expected, get a WISC.
What you shouldn't do is drive yourself crazy trying to understand why a kid with a high GBRS, high test scores, and advanced in all subjects got rejected. You won't ever get an answer.
Anonymous wrote:Our school uses the same exact worksheet for every packet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I just wish they were upfront about it. Instead of this ‘your kid scored in the 99th percentile on the COUNTY ADMINISTERED test and doesn’t qualify for an advanced program because the teacher heard them make fart jokes instead of solving Pythagorean equations in a second grade classroom.’
My kid was the one solving Pythagorean equations in 2nd grade. He still got a low GBRS, because the teacher didn't understand what he was doing.
People here are trying too hard to make sense of a process that is kind of random. I had a mysterious rejection for my oldest kid and met with the AART. The AART flat out said that every single year, a handful of kids from that school get rejected with strong packets that highly endorse them for AAP and another handful mysteriously get in with nothing whatsoever in the packet to suggest that they belong in AAP. So, at least 10% of the AAP decisions flat out make no sense, even to very experienced AARTs.
Anonymous wrote:Sorry for the double post. Really, though, if your kid gets rejected from AAP, but you think they belong, these are basically the only approaches you can take:
If test scores and GBRS are high, just continue appealing and reapplying. Eventually your kid will get in.
If the test scores are high but GBRS is low, try to figure out what's happening in the classroom. It's possible that the GBRS in 3rd will magically become strong, but it's also possible that your child isn't demonstrating much of anything in the classroom.
If the GBRS is high, but the test scores are much lower than you expected, get a WISC.
What you shouldn't do is drive yourself crazy trying to understand why a kid with a high GBRS, high test scores, and advanced in all subjects got rejected. You won't ever get an answer.
Anonymous wrote:
I just wish they were upfront about it. Instead of this ‘your kid scored in the 99th percentile on the COUNTY ADMINISTERED test and doesn’t qualify for an advanced program because the teacher heard them make fart jokes instead of solving Pythagorean equations in a second grade classroom.’
Anonymous wrote:Ok. Fair. 95% on GBRS. My point is that they know who they want/need to recommend before they even get the scores back. The scores are just theater.
Anonymous wrote:I just don’t understand why they test at all if they are going to 100% base it on GBRS.
I think the county has quotas based on the new ‘One Fairfax’ equity initiative and each school has to participate in making the AAP program look the way they want it.
Not that it doesn’t make sense, kids who don’t have resources to prep and don’t have a stable home environment would benefit most from a center based program. And it would reduce bus shortages and a whole range of issues the county has.
I just wish they were upfront about it. Instead of this ‘your kid scored in the 99th percentile on the COUNTY ADMINISTERED test and doesn’t qualify for an advanced program because the teacher heard them make fart jokes instead of solving Pythagorean equations in a second grade classroom.’
Anonymous wrote:I was quite frankly appalled at what was written for my daughter's GBRS. Who writes these? Are these written at the sole discretion of the classroom teacher?
The school keeps touting the central committee and the decision is not in the school's hands. But if they submitted a bad GBRS and silly work samples ( 1 was decent but some were so basic no gifted kid could make it good), they completely control this. I don't buy the central committee argument. Yes there is a committee but a crappy submission by the school, won't win anyone over. Scores, grades and my referral were excellent. AART program doesn't seem to allow 1 on 1 meetings with parents.
I read somewhere the principal, AART teacher and regular teacher decide the GBRS. This would bother me. My daughter said the interaction with AART is hard because she raises her hand and doesn't get chosen. Principal has formed an impression of my kid based on comments made to me that I could see being very one sided (single treacher or administrator can't get to know 100's of kids).
Her actual teacher loves her. I don't think these GBRS would have happened had she been able to do them on her own and not by committee. But I'm willing to be told I'm wrong![]()