Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all it’s not May 1st yet. Second of all, I feel bad for the teenagers under the microscope of nosy strangers like OP.
OP wasn't putting anyone under a microscope. This is a standard topic on this forum. If it makes you feel bad, you can leave, I suppose?
There are daily threads on this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My high stats DC was WL to several Top 15-30 schools that in the recent past (2021, 2022) they were strongly located in the 100% zone on SCOIR for Sidwell.
Not that we ever expected 100%, but striking out on so many of those was a clear change from the past - they were not alone in this sort of outcome.
In this same T15-30 in 100% SCOIR zone:
- one regular acceptance
- one acceptance via an alternative entry pathway (for example - late start/early start/abroad/satellite ).
Rejected in all Top 10 and Top SLAC applications.
Accepted to some safeties T40-T60 and a low SLAC.
DC was grateful to have some options. This year was a shift for sure.
When you say Top SLAC can you be more specific ?
Think along the lines of ....Williams, Amherst, Pomona, Swarthmore
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My high stats DC was WL to several Top 15-30 schools that in the recent past (2021, 2022) they were strongly located in the 100% zone on SCOIR for Sidwell.
Not that we ever expected 100%, but striking out on so many of those was a clear change from the past - they were not alone in this sort of outcome.
In this same T15-30 in 100% SCOIR zone:
- one regular acceptance
- one acceptance via an alternative entry pathway (for example - late start/early start/abroad/satellite ).
Rejected in all Top 10 and Top SLAC applications.
Accepted to some safeties T40-T60 and a low SLAC.
DC was grateful to have some options. This year was a shift for sure.
When you say Top SLAC can you be more specific ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all it’s not May 1st yet. Second of all, I feel bad for the teenagers under the microscope of nosy strangers like OP.
OP wasn't putting anyone under a microscope. This is a standard topic on this forum. If it makes you feel bad, you can leave, I suppose?
Anonymous wrote:My high stats DC was WL to several Top 15-30 schools that in the recent past (2021, 2022) they were strongly located in the 100% zone on SCOIR for Sidwell.
Not that we ever expected 100%, but striking out on so many of those was a clear change from the past - they were not alone in this sort of outcome.
In this same T15-30 in 100% SCOIR zone:
- one regular acceptance
- one acceptance via an alternative entry pathway (for example - late start/early start/abroad/satellite ).
Rejected in all Top 10 and Top SLAC applications.
Accepted to some safeties T40-T60 and a low SLAC.
DC was grateful to have some options. This year was a shift for sure.
Anonymous wrote:My high stats DC was WL to several Top 15-30 schools that in the recent past (2021, 2022) they were strongly located in the 100% zone on SCOIR for Sidwell.
Not that we ever expected 100%, but striking out on so many of those was a clear change from the past - they were not alone in this sort of outcome.
In this same T15-30 in 100% SCOIR zone:
- one regular acceptance
- one acceptance via an alternative entry pathway (for example - late start/early start/abroad/satellite ).
Rejected in all Top 10 and Top SLAC applications.
Accepted to some safeties T40-T60 and a low SLAC.
DC was grateful to have some options. This year was a shift for sure.
Anonymous wrote:My high stats DC was WL to several Top 15-30 schools that in the recent past (2021, 2022) they were strongly located in the 100% zone on SCOIR for Sidwell.
Not that we ever expected 100%, but striking out on so many of those was a clear change from the past - they were not alone in this sort of outcome.
In this same T15-30 in 100% SCOIR zone:
- one regular acceptance
- one acceptance via an alternative entry pathway (for example - late start/early start/abroad/satellite ).
Rejected in all Top 10 and Top SLAC applications.
Accepted to some safeties T40-T60 and a low SLAC.
DC was grateful to have some options. This year was a shift for sure.
Anonymous wrote:First of all it’s not May 1st yet. Second of all, I feel bad for the teenagers under the microscope of nosy strangers like OP.