Anonymous wrote:I chose to take about 18 months off from work, but had I stayed in my job, we would have spent an amount about equal to my take-home pay on childcare those first two years. Of course, I didn't think of that money as coming out my paycheck only -- it would be a joint expense between my DH and I. But this fact did factor into my decision to stay home because I really, really wanted to by home with my baby and the idea of going to my job every day so that I could earn just enough money to pay someone else to do the thing I wanted to be doing was very annoying to me. That bothered me way more than the money -- the fact that I wanted to be the one taking my baby to the park and story time a singing songs and playing together. It's hard to pay someone else to do something you really want to do yourself, so I didn't.
plus, 401 k accrued. Matching company investments occurred.Anonymous wrote:this is a good point. Rank improved. Salary went up. Promotion occurred. Position remained. All while working…Anonymous wrote:A lot, but I paid into social security, carried our healthcare insurance, built my career.
I make a lot of money now and that could never have happened had I left the workforce.
this is a good point. Rank improved. Salary went up. Promotion occurred. Position remained. All while working…Anonymous wrote:A lot, but I paid into social security, carried our healthcare insurance, built my career.
I make a lot of money now and that could never have happened had I left the workforce.
A lot, but I paid into social security, carried our healthcare insurance, built my career.
I make a lot of money now and that could never have happened had I left the workforce.
Anonymous wrote:None? We paid for daycare for 3 and 3.5 years for each child and I worked the whole time for much more money than what daycare cost. Maybe I don’t understand the question. I would have lost money staying home.