Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I teach college in a non-STEM discipline. Even my undergraduates are not helpful in a research context. We teach them and prepare them as best we can, but the real research training happens in graduate school. It's just the nature of my field.
The professor that mentored my HS kid was amazing. Hard science prof and DC had difficult tasks. It was great and the prof used DCs work in a paper and invited DC back to do more work.
Anonymous wrote:I teach college in a non-STEM discipline. Even my undergraduates are not helpful in a research context. We teach them and prepare them as best we can, but the real research training happens in graduate school. It's just the nature of my field.
Anonymous wrote:My kid’s school has a required internship. He did it with a professor near where his school is. The professor’s RA gave him discreet research tasks and asked him to write up memos summarizing what he found. They were pleased and said they might add his name to the paper they were publishing. So officially he will have published research but what he contributed was definitely organized research tasks. He’s a great smart 17 year old and writes well but was not discovering science secrets on his own or anything.
Anonymous wrote:I’m with you. Scientist type myself. Worked in NIH research labs as a HS student every summer in late 80s. They finally put me on a publication when I was already in college.
There are literarily companies these days that help kids get set up with what seems to be bogus research projects at schools that the companies pay (which is really parent money).
There are a few real things like regeneron prizes and there are kids who still do NIH type work these days but publications are not usually forthcoming unless the same said parents have bought them via these for profit programs.
It’s all part of this performative dance we do as the only country in the world that looks at ECs and research for 16 - 18 year olds. This doesn’t happen in the UK or France. I’m sure they turn out kids just as smart
We’ve decided somewhere that we need resumes that look like super humans to get into a top 50.
It’s all BS and many of these research projects and club presidencies are bogus, no work or bought by mom and dad.
Anonymous wrote:This board often claims published research as a necessary requirement for top college admissions. Has anyone read this research? I know a lot of smart kids and they don’t seem ready for real research. So I guess I call BS and wonder why colleges are seeking this? I used to work at a prestigious job, and I can tell you, the college interns were not ready to write memos, let alone research. And, the ones who thought they were ready for high level critical thinking were, quite frankly, the worst. So, who are these HS kids?
I have heard of kids being research assistants in labs (usually because an adult helped them get organized) but only doing what they were told, not driving any of the critical thinking (which actually seems appropriate for a high school kid). I have also read published papers in the humanities written by high school students, and while fine, I didn’t think they were setting the world on fire (again, the papers felt expected and appropriate). This includes my kid, btw.
Anyway, I find the idea of truly independent, cutting-edge HS research suspect. Are we talking past one another?