Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Manicured lawns are an environmental waste. Clover lawns and easy to manage perennials are the better way to go.
+1 I hate manicured lawns. So fakey fake.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Manicured lawns are an environmental waste. Clover lawns and easy to manage perennials are the better way to go.
Ok. I don't disagree. But these neighborhoods have grass lawns. They are not maintained and look ugly. If you keep grass, you should at least maintain it.
Look at the sidewalks. They are full of grass with weed. If it was only the weed, that would be fine, but the worst thing is that nobody is even cutting the grass. It either looks thin and dead or neglected like a forest.
Anonymous wrote:Manicured lawns are an environmental waste. Clover lawns and easy to manage perennials are the better way to go.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Manicured lawns are an environmental waste. Clover lawns and easy to manage perennials are the better way to go.
Ok. I don't disagree. But these neighborhoods have grass lawns. They are not maintained and look ugly. If you keep grass, you should at least maintain it.
Look at the sidewalks. They are full of grass with weed. If it was only the weed, that would be fine, but the worst thing is that nobody is even cutting the grass. It either looks thin and dead or neglected like a forest.
Speaking only for myself here, and living in Chevy Chase, DC, my two options are to spend all the hours from 6 PM till sundown doing my own lawn, or paying an outside firm $800 a month to achieve your aesthetic goal. It would be far cheaper to just get guys to cut the grass, but to achieve what you’re actually talking about is about 800 a month
Does that answer your question?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Manicured lawns are an environmental waste. Clover lawns and easy to manage perennials are the better way to go.
Ok. I don't disagree. But these neighborhoods have grass lawns. They are not maintained and look ugly. If you keep grass, you should at least maintain it.
Look at the sidewalks. They are full of grass with weed. If it was only the weed, that would be fine, but the worst thing is that nobody is even cutting the grass. It either looks thin and dead or neglected like a forest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Manicured lawns are an environmental waste. Clover lawns and easy to manage perennials are the better way to go.
Ok. I don't disagree. But these neighborhoods have grass lawns. They are not maintained and look ugly. If you keep grass, you should at least maintain it.
Look at the sidewalks. They are full of grass with weed. If it was only the weed, that would be fine, but the worst thing is that nobody is even cutting the grass. It either looks thin and dead or neglected like a forest.
Anonymous wrote:Manicured lawns are an environmental waste. Clover lawns and easy to manage perennials are the better way to go.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Manicured lawns are an environmental waste. Clover lawns and easy to manage perennials are the better way to go.
+1 I hate manicured lawns. So fakey fake.
Anonymous wrote:There are many affluent neighborhoods in NW DC. Residents are definitely doing well. However, the landscaping, yards and curb appeal in these neighborhoods are so bad.
Weed is everywhere. They don't care so much about keeping their yards nice and beautiful. No manicured lawns. You can tell that they don't value landscaping. Even the city doesn't value landscaping on the streets.
Why is that? I can't imagine this is about money and cost.
You drive in many average suburbs around here and you'll see a very different picture. Nice and beautiful manicured lawns.
Are DC residents just more nasty? I don't get it.
Anonymous wrote:Manicured lawns are an environmental waste. Clover lawns and easy to manage perennials are the better way to go.