Anonymous wrote:With it being increasingly difficult to get into Latin or BASIS, and with increased demand as more UMC families hit middle school, and with all the uncertainty around selective high school admissions, it seems like there would be a lot of interest in a new charter middle and/or high school whose value prop was differentiation/advanced classes. I know there's Latin Cooper. But are there not more attempts at this because they wouldn't get approved, or because it's very difficult to get the real estate, or something else? Thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With it being increasingly difficult to get into Latin or BASIS, and with increased demand as more UMC families hit middle school, and with all the uncertainty around selective high school admissions, it seems like there would be a lot of interest in a new charter middle and/or high school whose value prop was differentiation/advanced classes. I know there's Latin Cooper. But are there not more attempts at this because they wouldn't get approved, or because it's very difficult to get the real estate, or something else? Thank you.
Do those schools actually provide tracking/advanced classes? Or is it just that their school population is self-selective and primarily UMC, with all the benefits that come from that? DCI has a level of tracking in math and languages (but it is not a G&T set-up at all), but it doesn't apply across the whole curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:but isn't the question, why aren't there enough EXCLUSIVE or TRACKED academically oriented middle school programs?
Meaning, "how can I get my child away from poor performers, because having them in class with my child is a problem or at least I assume it is because this is America and race, class, and achievement in America have never not be commingled and confounded?"
Anonymous wrote:With it being increasingly difficult to get into Latin or BASIS, and with increased demand as more UMC families hit middle school, and with all the uncertainty around selective high school admissions, it seems like there would be a lot of interest in a new charter middle and/or high school whose value prop was differentiation/advanced classes. I know there's Latin Cooper. But are there not more attempts at this because they wouldn't get approved, or because it's very difficult to get the real estate, or something else? Thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There aren't that many middle schoolers who are academically advanced. Between those who want to attend their inbound school or follow the feeder pattern they're already in and the charters that start with ms, most of the need is met. And the dcpcsb is not interested in granting charters to cherry pick rich, white, or high-scoring kids...they want to close the achievement gap.
This. After BASIS, Latin, Latin, DCI, Deal, Hardy, and those who genuinely want their IB, and Inspired Teaching (which does consistently have a high-scoring group of kids and some people are very much into it), plus the people who always planned on private, there aren't that many high-achieving kids left. And those kids are not localized in any one area. And their parents won't necessarily have confidence in a brand new school with no track record, and it'll be small and that really limits the offerings. I really think so much of the demand is met, especially when Cooper is at full size, that there just isn't the appetite for more.
Anonymous wrote:With it being increasingly difficult to get into Latin or BASIS, and with increased demand as more UMC families hit middle school, and with all the uncertainty around selective high school admissions, it seems like there would be a lot of interest in a new charter middle and/or high school whose value prop was differentiation/advanced classes. I know there's Latin Cooper. But are there not more attempts at this because they wouldn't get approved, or because it's very difficult to get the real estate, or something else? Thank you.
Anonymous wrote:but isn't the question, why aren't there enough EXCLUSIVE or TRACKED academically oriented middle school programs?
Meaning, "how can I get my child away from poor performers, because having them in class with my child is a problem or at least I assume it is because this is America and race, class, and achievement in America have never not be commingled and confounded?"
Anonymous wrote:There aren't that many middle schoolers who are academically advanced. Between those who want to attend their inbound school or follow the feeder pattern they're already in and the charters that start with ms, most of the need is met. And the dcpcsb is not interested in granting charters to cherry pick rich, white, or high-scoring kids...they want to close the achievement gap.
Anonymous wrote:How about we rephrase the question:
Why doesn't DC do anything to make DCPS middle and high schools stronger and attract more families that are looking for academic rigor?