Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it was for 9th grade? By 9th, the bona fides of the student matter more than a school “talking them up” (which is more appropriate for entry into 5/6/7th).
It’s a jungle out there and a lot of really well-qualified students didn’t get in. It sucks but it’s true.
There is definitely more demand than supply which imputes a strong business model (just don’t advertise on the radio, lose 5 HoSs and be for profit).
But every post that’s pro-k-8 talks about how great the outplacement is, how the HoS goes to bat for each and every kid and each and every one lands in the right school. Not true?
Anonymous wrote:never bothered with private in the first place. seriously you're in the DMV there's a plethora of excellent, well funded public schools with a diverse, international and high achieving cohort.
Private is just for the behaviorally challenged.
Anonymous wrote:never bothered with private in the first place. seriously you're in the DMV there's a plethora of excellent, well funded public schools with a diverse, international and high achieving cohort.
Private is just for the behaviorally challenged.
Anonymous wrote:So it was for 9th grade? By 9th, the bona fides of the student matter more than a school “talking them up” (which is more appropriate for entry into 5/6/7th).
It’s a jungle out there and a lot of really well-qualified students didn’t get in. It sucks but it’s true.
There is definitely more demand than supply which imputes a strong business model (just don’t advertise on the radio, lose 5 HoSs and be for profit).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd be more on top of the current school because they dropped the ball on a few things that had a fairly large impact on the outcome I believe.
This and we were at a k8. Our kid fell through the cracks and was waitlisted because school thought they would "be fine and never thought that would happen to them".... Huge disappointment and no I will not name the school.
Anonymous wrote:Not asking you the name the school, but what “crack” did your kid fall through that allows you to assume that they were waitlisted because of it, as opposed to the process just being competitive?
Anonymous wrote:I'd be more on top of the current school because they dropped the ball on a few things that had a fairly large impact on the outcome I believe.