Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the Feds basically say they will cover all depositors without limit? Why does anyone care?
No? The fed said specifically that that’s not what’s happening. SVB had enough from the sales of its securities to cover deposits.
This is inaccurate. The securities still sit on the balance sheet of the receiver bank. It will take some time to see if recoveries from SVB's assets (dominated by securities) will be sufficient to pay off all the depositors, insured and uninsured. If not, there will be an assessment on banks.
So where did the cash come from if it was not the banks securities and the govt did not bail out? All depositors were made whole today.
All the other banks in the US and their customers are bailing out SVB depositors.
Not the “taxpayer”.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the Feds basically say they will cover all depositors without limit? Why does anyone care?
No? The fed said specifically that that’s not what’s happening. SVB had enough from the sales of its securities to cover deposits.
This is inaccurate. The securities still sit on the balance sheet of the receiver bank. It will take some time to see if recoveries from SVB's assets (dominated by securities) will be sufficient to pay off all the depositors, insured and uninsured. If not, there will be an assessment on banks.
So where did the cash come from if it was not the banks securities and the govt did not bail out? All depositors were made whole today.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the Feds basically say they will cover all depositors without limit? Why does anyone care?
No? The fed said specifically that that’s not what’s happening. SVB had enough from the sales of its securities to cover deposits.
This is inaccurate. The securities still sit on the balance sheet of the receiver bank. It will take some time to see if recoveries from SVB's assets (dominated by securities) will be sufficient to pay off all the depositors, insured and uninsured. If not, there will be an assessment on banks.
Anonymous wrote:Yawn
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the Feds basically say they will cover all depositors without limit? Why does anyone care?
No? The fed said specifically that that’s not what’s happening. SVB had enough from the sales of its securities to cover deposits.
Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the Feds basically say they will cover all depositors without limit? Why does anyone care?
Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the Feds basically say they will cover all depositors without limit? Why does anyone care?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ouch Ally is on there. Or is that a different Ally?
No it's the same Ally.
Anonymous wrote:Ouch Ally is on there. Or is that a different Ally?