Anonymous wrote:Something that I really like about the school is the fostering of reasoned discourse. They intentionally cultivate the ability to communicate about a hard topic in a thoughtful way. (Isn’t this much needed in our society?) In the case of the middle school unit on Roman history, for example, hard topics are not emotionally charged because the people, events, and society are in the past. If only present day topics were discussed then emotions would get hot in a hurry …like on DCUM!
My criticism of the school is not with their thoughtful and intelligent faculty, nor with their belief in objective truth, but rather with the lack of access to this excellence. Catholic educators are called not to be elitist. They are called to be a light unto the world, not just an inner circle. To my mind, it’s an act of intellectual charity to bring the education they offer to more boys beyond siblings or the sons of alumni and teachers. Seems like there’s no room in the inn for the stranger!
Anonymous wrote:Something that I really like about the school is the fostering of reasoned discourse. They intentionally cultivate the ability to communicate about a hard topic in a thoughtful way. (Isn’t this much needed in our society?) In the case of the middle school unit on Roman history, for example, hard topics are not emotionally charged because the people, events, and society are in the past. If only present day topics were discussed then emotions would get hot in a hurry …like on DCUM!
My criticism of the school is not with their thoughtful and intelligent faculty, nor with their belief in objective truth, but rather with the lack of access to this excellence. Catholic educators are called not to be elitist. They are called to be a light unto the world, not just an inner circle. To my mind, it’s an act of intellectual charity to bring the education they offer to more boys beyond siblings or the sons of alumni and teachers. Seems like there’s no room in the inn for the stranger!
Anonymous wrote:Something that I really like about the school is the fostering of reasoned discourse. They intentionally cultivate the ability to communicate about a hard topic in a thoughtful way. (Isn’t this much needed in our society?) In the case of the middle school unit on Roman history, for example, hard topics are not emotionally charged because the people, events, and society are in the past. If only present day topics were discussed then emotions would get hot in a hurry …like on DCUM!
My criticism of the school is not with their thoughtful and intelligent faculty, nor with their belief in objective truth, but rather with the lack of access to this excellence. Catholic educators are called not to be elitist. They are called to be a light unto the world, not just an inner circle. To my mind, it’s an act of intellectual charity to bring the education they offer to more boys beyond siblings or the sons of alumni and teachers. Seems like there’s no room in the inn for the stranger!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there a waitlist at every grade for The Heights?
I saw the other thread about only taking 5 new boys at an intake grade. Ouch! (Almost all places go to siblings, children of alumni and faculty.)
It’s discouraging that they offer a great but inaccessible school. Why get unhooked families excited just to reject them?
Yes.Yes. The house is extremely popular because it is the only ultra conservatives left. The Heights is extremely popular because it is the only ultra conservative school in the DMV. The school is extremely popular because it is the only ultra conservative school so people have few extra conservative choices. For that reason, people who want an ultra conservative, ultra Catholic, old fashioned style upbringing for their children will pick the Heights and if they get in, they will accept they have an excellent yield!
It’s a school for the good old boys? PP is incorrect in stating there is a shortage of those. There are plenty in the DMV. Maybe the Heights is more open about it, but we have plenty institutions around here that are “ultra conservative”.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there a waitlist at every grade for The Heights?
I saw the other thread about only taking 5 new boys at an intake grade. Ouch! (Almost all places go to siblings, children of alumni and faculty.)
It’s discouraging that they offer a great but inaccessible school. Why get unhooked families excited just to reject them?
Yes.Yes. The house is extremely popular because it is the only ultra conservatives left. The Heights is extremely popular because it is the only ultra conservative school in the DMV. The school is extremely popular because it is the only ultra conservative school so people have few extra conservative choices. For that reason, people who want an ultra conservative, ultra Catholic, old fashioned style upbringing for their children will pick the Heights and if they get in, they will accept they have an excellent yield!
Anonymous wrote:Is there a waitlist at every grade for The Heights?
I saw the other thread about only taking 5 new boys at an intake grade. Ouch! (Almost all places go to siblings, children of alumni and faculty.)
It’s discouraging that they offer a great but inaccessible school. Why get unhooked families excited just to reject them?
Anonymous wrote:Is there a waitlist at every grade for The Heights?
I saw the other thread about only taking 5 new boys at an intake grade. Ouch! (Almost all places go to siblings, children of alumni and faculty.)
It’s discouraging that they offer a great but inaccessible school. Why get unhooked families excited just to reject them?
Anonymous wrote:Is there a waitlist at every grade for The Heights?
I saw the other thread about only taking 5 new boys at an intake grade. Ouch! (Almost all places go to siblings, children of alumni and faculty.)
It’s discouraging that they offer a great but inaccessible school. Why get unhooked families excited just to reject them?