Anonymous wrote:The short answer to your question is 50+ years of poor urban planning and car-centric design. In most cases, the decision to make things unwalkable was very much on purpose. We've (mostly) realized the error of that approach by now, but walkable spaces are now pretty scarce outside of pre-WWII neighborhoods, and they're enough in demand that they go for a large price premium even though walkability doesn't really cost more to build.
We're starting to retrofit walkable infrastructure into suburban neighborhoods, but it'll take decades, and we're limited with what can be done within the constraints of many of the choices that are already baked in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When we lived in Arlington our kids could easily walk to all three schools (ES, MS, HS) in their pyramid.
We are in Arlington too and are just over a mile from all three schools. On the edge of the walk zone for MS and HS but just over it for ES so could use a bus. They would all be about a 20 minute walk. To give us more time in the a.m, we generally drive them to school. Had to pick up from extended day in ES but in MS and HS they have liked walking home with friends.
Anonymous wrote:When we lived in Arlington our kids could easily walk to all three schools (ES, MS, HS) in their pyramid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because schools are big. ES have 500+ kids instead of small ones. And it only gets bigger from there.
+1
Everything is on a massive scale.
Yes. And even if you do find something walkable it's very rare to be walkable to ES and MS and HS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because schools are big. ES have 500+ kids instead of small ones. And it only gets bigger from there.
+1
Everything is on a massive scale.
Anonymous wrote:Because schools are big. ES have 500+ kids instead of small ones. And it only gets bigger from there.