. But the colleges can clearly see she got a B, regardless of the weight.Anonymous wrote:Your dd’s b+ in Ap bio equates to a 4.3 on a weighted basis.
Anonymous wrote:Here is what we saw in HS. Example below for illustrative purposes for 1 course and 2 students.
Student 1 who is very bright and excels in the course:
MP 1 99% = A
MP 2 98.2% = A
Semester 1 grade which appears on the transcript = A
MP3 98.9% = A
MP 4 99.1% = A
Semester 2 grade which appears on the transcript = A
Now, let's review a 2nd student, who is in the same exact class, yet this person is not exceling in the course and so their parents intervene with help, paid tutoring, and extra work...to get their college bound student into the B+ and even A- range.
MP 1 84.5% = B
MP 2 90.1% = A
Take the higher of the two marking period grades and award an A for Semester 1 on the transcript
MP 3 91.2% = A
MP 4 83% = B
Take the higher of the two marking period grades and award an A for Semester 2.
So, we have 2 students applying to the same college. They look very similar, with Semester grades of As for the course.
Yet, in reality, one is a very high earning A student and the second is a solid B student, with a sprinkle of A-.
And, if these is an Honors Course, it's scored the same as an AP grade! Think about the difference between the AP student who got all A's and student#2. Now multiply this calc. over years and years of courses. Your strong, even low, B student just has to break the 90% threshold for 2 marking periods a year to capture the A.
In my opinion, this is grade inflation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If more than half the kids in a class get an A, there is grade inflation. And yes, I understand that there is grade inflation everywhere. Everyone gets a trophy.
But one could infer from such a cynical remark that you don’t believe those As are earned.
The purpose of primary and secondary education is to teach mastery of material. It’s not to generate a bell curve where top grades are rationed. Thinking about top grades as a commodity in this way is bizarre and antiquated. It’s literally Ok if half the class gets and A, even if they get to have retakes the like — because it demonstrates they learned the material. Which is the purpose of education. It’s not a race to learn the material “first” and it’s not like someone had to be “best” at it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If more than half the kids in a class get an A, there is grade inflation. And yes, I understand that there is grade inflation everywhere. Everyone gets a trophy.
But if the grades are inflated for everyone, there are still students that stand out because of superior work. If everyone get an a then the top students will get more than an A.
Nope that’s the problem with grade inflation, it masks the truly superior students.
Really, it does not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If more than half the kids in a class get an A, there is grade inflation. And yes, I understand that there is grade inflation everywhere. Everyone gets a trophy.
But if the grades are inflated for everyone, there are still students that stand out because of superior work. If everyone get an a then the top students will get more than an A.
Nope that’s the problem with grade inflation, it masks the truly superior students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If more than half the kids in a class get an A, there is grade inflation. And yes, I understand that there is grade inflation everywhere. Everyone gets a trophy.
But if the grades are inflated for everyone, there are still students that stand out because of superior work. If everyone get an a then the top students will get more than an A.
Anonymous wrote:If more than half the kids in a class get an A, there is grade inflation. And yes, I understand that there is grade inflation everywhere. Everyone gets a trophy.
Anonymous wrote:If more than half the kids in a class get an A, there is grade inflation. And yes, I understand that there is grade inflation everywhere. Everyone gets a trophy.