Looking to marry well

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Despite what feminist want you to think , women still want to be attractive

You don't understand feminism. Women can and should make their own decisions regardless of what DCUM ninnies think. I assume she did it because *gasp* she felt like it.

A lot easier to do whatever when your daddy is a billionaire. She is another Hilton girl.

Yup, just another Nepo Baby. She's not pretty enough to have done it without her family's name.

Feels like angsty rebellion. Vast majority of billionaire heirs want to stay out of the public eye for privacy and security reasons. Visibility is expensive. I guarantee these photos are drawing out some loons, which then becomes a headache for her father & their security team.

I guess I don’t see the payoff here for her other attention for the sake of attention. Like, what’s the point?

Apparently she is very single. Which I find to also be odd as she would normally be courted by high quality men (successful, handsome, educated, could contribute to the family company, etc).

The entire situation is really weird. Something is not being said here - dad plans on excluding her from the estate? Mental illness? There’s more to this story, I bet.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Despite what feminist want you to think , women still want to be attractive

You don't understand feminism. Women can and should make their own decisions regardless of what DCUM ninnies think. I assume she did it because *gasp* she felt like it.

A lot easier to do whatever when your daddy is a billionaire. She is another Hilton girl.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Despite what feminist want you to think , women still want to be attractive

You don't understand feminism. Women can and should make their own decisions regardless of what DCUM ninnies think. I assume she did it because *gasp* she felt like it.

Amen, pp. Also, it’s possible to be confident in your own skin AND enjoy that others find you attractive. They’re not mutually exclusive.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with making yourself attractive. I actually think we should create a culture in which more men feel the pressure to keep better care of themselves/make themselves more attractive but that's a different conversation.

I’d do it too if I had her body. I don’t care about social status but getting paid for it would be the icing on the cake. 🤑🤑

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Despite what feminist want you to think , women still want to be attractive

You don't understand feminism. Women can and should make their own decisions regardless of what DCUM ninnies think. I assume she did it because *gasp* she felt like it.

Amen, pp. Also, it’s possible to be confident in your own skin AND enjoy that others find you attractive. They’re not mutually exclusive.

men's attention

Anonymous wrote:Despite what feminist want you to think , women still want to be attractive

You don't understand feminism. Women can and should make their own decisions regardless of what DCUM ninnies think. I assume she did it because *gasp* she felt like it.

The term that comes to mind is cheesy.

Lamar would be ashamed.

I am always skeptical of anyone with wealth who is "volunteering" for multiple nonprofits. That means they show up, get their photo doing their so-called good deeds, and leave the hard work to the unsung behind the scenes.

The second big red flag is when they start their own nonprofit. I think every decent publication should have an automatic link in the story to the organization's IRS info.

Nonprofits are a dime a dozen now and there appears to be no oversight. So you will see people like this exploit it as nothing more than a way to make themselves look good, get some great tax advantages, claim all kinds of b.s. as their nonprofit expenses and then throw a couple of bucks at the actual mission.

As for her photo spread, I can simply point out the hypocrisy that she, "... also works with New Friends New Life, which provides services and assistance for those victimized by human trafficking."

The Hunt family doesn't need to be self-promoting. They are the wealthiest family in Dallas. Her mother was from a suburban middle class family from Kansas City, MO. She was a beauty pageant winner. Maybe Gracie wants to be like her mother.

The Kardashians, the Hiltons, and other wealthy American heiresses seem to follow in their mother's footsteps, even though they already have wealth and power.

To me, it seems debating to pose practically nude for a men's magazine or to have a reality TV show.

I think their mothers are the variable here.

Despite what feminist want you to think , women still want to be attractive

She’s trying to launch her next “successful” path. Her family is clearly the self-promoting type.

I saw this cover of Maxim magazine of Gracie Hunt. She is a wealthy heiress, the daughter of the KC Chiefs owner.

Any idea why she would want to pose like this? I always thought women, especially young women, did this for money or social advancement. She doesn't need either. Is it for social power?

https://www.maxim.com/news/gracie-hunt-is-maxims-march-april-cover-star/amp/