Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:we have to normalize reality. Sad but true. Everyone gets old and "melts" and then dies. It has to stop being shamed.

It isn’t shamed. Some women can’t handle not being sexually appealing anymore or getting male attention. Their self worth is tied to how attractive they feel men perceive them.

I get procedures for myself and myself only. It has nothing to do with men (I’m gay) but it also has nothing to do with women. I want to look a certain way in the mirror. A way that looks familiar to me.

Take your projection of your own issues and shove it.

Anonymous wrote:we have to normalize reality. Sad but true. Everyone gets old and "melts" and then dies. It has to stop being shamed.

It isn’t shamed. Some women can’t handle not being sexually appealing anymore or getting male attention. Their self worth is tied to how attractive they feel men perceive them.

Anonymous wrote:The first or even second time in minimal amounts, yes. And never the lips!

After that, no. The old stuff never fully dissolves (no matter what they claim) and it begins to migrate some. By then women are hooked and gi mite frequently and end up with distorted marshmallow faces. That’s why good surgeons will just do a lift instead.

I would never get filler anywhere except my lips.

we have to normalize reality. Sad but true. Everyone gets old and "melts" and then dies. It has to stop being shamed.

Anonymous wrote:IMO if Ivanka Trump, Nicole Kidman, Hillary Clinton can’t get natural-looking fillers it can’t be accomplished. They have access to everything. Yet they looks like uncanny valley freaks

Not sure about the other two, but Hillary Clinton would look even worse without them.
She never had any bone structure and she's objectively old (or too old for the camera).

The look best between 48-55, after that nature wins.

IMO if Ivanka Trump, Nicole Kidman, Hillary Clinton can’t get natural-looking fillers it can’t be accomplished. They have access to everything. Yet they looks like uncanny valley freaks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My sister got fillers after weight loss and looks younger, so perhaps this is a “YMMV” situation.

Yeah I lost 73 pounds and needed something to not look like my face was melting like a Dali painting. I may or may not look younger but I definitely look better I can tell you that!

Exactly how my sister's looked before fillers! They stopped the "melt", and she looks -- and, more importantly -- feels great again.

The first or even second time in minimal amounts, yes. And never the lips!

After that, no. The old stuff never fully dissolves (no matter what they claim) and it begins to migrate some. By then women are hooked and gi mite frequently and end up with distorted marshmallow faces. That’s why good surgeons will just do a lift instead.

Anonymous wrote:My sister got fillers after weight loss and looks younger, so perhaps this is a “YMMV” situation.

Yeah I lost 73 pounds and needed something to not look like my face was melting like a Dali painting. I may or may not look younger but I definitely look better I can tell you that!

My sister got fillers after weight loss and looks younger, so perhaps this is a “YMMV” situation.

That’s an ad for another type of facial procedure. Good grief OP, you’re trying so hard to shame Madonna that you are giving that surgeon free exposure.

I mean, this is a plastic surgeon trying to sell a different procedure.

I think the problem is that fillers absolutely do help people look younger. At first. But yes, they stay in your face, don’t fully dissolve, they shift, and there are many things fillers can’t do.

He even shows how good Madonna looked at 45/50 with some “replaced volume”. It’s just now there are too many fillers in her face and she’s trying to accomplish something with them that isn’t possible.

what do you care

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Coh7EOKJ3nY/?igshid=MDJmNzVkMjY=

Refreshing to finally hear that fillers don’t fully ever dissolve, and they don’t make you look younger they change the way you look not for the better.