Anonymous wrote:I also did not understand the point of the article. Is she selling us her happiness? Why do we care? Is it a humblebrag? Is the NYT mocking her? Or is it a piece they had to do as a favor for her well connected family and spouse?
Don’t get me wrong- have nothing against them. Just don’t understand why a relative nobody is in the NYT gloating about her life.
Anonymous wrote:She’s an evangelical. Part of it is to sell the lifestyle as beautiful and perfect. Why? Bc that’s a woman’s only job: to be beautiful and look happy next to her husband.
No one grew up in a perfect household when your dad was nailing the cleaning lady.
Anonymous wrote:She’s an evangelical. Part of it is to sell the lifestyle as beautiful and perfect. Why? Bc that’s a woman’s only job: to be beautiful and look happy next to her husband.
No one grew up in a perfect household when your dad was nailing the cleaning lady.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chris Pratt is a tool and Katherine has a half-brother from her dad’s affair that she ignores. No one believes her life is perfect.
I think the subtext is the article is that she’s deluding herself.
How often does her husband see his special needs child with Anna Farris?
Anonymous wrote:Chris Pratt is a tool and Katherine has a half-brother from her dad’s affair that she ignores. No one believes her life is perfect.
Anonymous wrote:She’s an evangelical. Part of it is to sell the lifestyle as beautiful and perfect. Why? Bc that’s a woman’s only job: to be beautiful and look happy next to her husband.
No one grew up in a perfect household when your dad was nailing the cleaning lady.