Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cosmetology and barbers don't need extensive licensing requirements. It's gatekeeping.
The argument I heard was that they use "chemicals" and have "sharp" tools. By that logic, landscapers should have licenses.
The hygiene requirements are my big concern. I don't want to catch someone's skin disease because the barber wasn't trained in cleaning their tools properly.
Licensing doesn't enforce this though. You want inspection of registered businesses.
The new DLCP has the cosmetology board, cosmetology licensing applications/licensing, and registered businesses all under its purview.
So why don't food vendors have the same extensive licensing requirements? You don't need a thousand hours of food prep training to open a hotdog cart or work in a McDonald's.
I think food vendors are licensed under DLCP, but with DOH guidelines. Not sure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cosmetology and barbers don't need extensive licensing requirements. It's gatekeeping.
The argument I heard was that they use "chemicals" and have "sharp" tools. By that logic, landscapers should have licenses.
The hygiene requirements are my big concern. I don't want to catch someone's skin disease because the barber wasn't trained in cleaning their tools properly.
Licensing doesn't enforce this though. You want inspection of registered businesses.
The new DLCP has the cosmetology board, cosmetology licensing applications/licensing, and registered businesses all under its purview.
So why don't food vendors have the same extensive licensing requirements? You don't need a thousand hours of food prep training to open a hotdog cart or work in a McDonald's.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cosmetology and barbers don't need extensive licensing requirements. It's gatekeeping.
The argument I heard was that they use "chemicals" and have "sharp" tools. By that logic, landscapers should have licenses.
The hygiene requirements are my big concern. I don't want to catch someone's skin disease because the barber wasn't trained in cleaning their tools properly.
Licensing doesn't enforce this though. You want inspection of registered businesses.
The new DLCP has the cosmetology board, cosmetology licensing applications/licensing, and registered businesses all under its purview.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cosmetology and barbers don't need extensive licensing requirements. It's gatekeeping.
The argument I heard was that they use "chemicals" and have "sharp" tools. By that logic, landscapers should have licenses.
The hygiene requirements are my big concern. I don't want to catch someone's skin disease because the barber wasn't trained in cleaning their tools properly.
Licensing doesn't enforce this though. You want inspection of registered businesses.
Anonymous wrote:You must be new. Corruption in DC government is endemic and has been for decades.
Anonymous wrote:Cosmetology and barbers don't need extensive licensing requirements. It's gatekeeping.
The argument I heard was that they use "chemicals" and have "sharp" tools. By that logic, landscapers should have licenses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cosmetology and barbers don't need extensive licensing requirements. It's gatekeeping.
The argument I heard was that they use "chemicals" and have "sharp" tools. By that logic, landscapers should have licenses.
The hygiene requirements are my big concern. I don't want to catch someone's skin disease because the barber wasn't trained in cleaning their tools properly.
Anonymous wrote:You must be new. Corruption in DC government is endemic and has been for decades.
Anonymous wrote:Cosmetology and barbers don't need extensive licensing requirements. It's gatekeeping.
The argument I heard was that they use "chemicals" and have "sharp" tools. By that logic, landscapers should have licenses.