Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd believe that there's something to it, but it's not that cut-and-dried. For some people, skipping breakfast leads to overeating later, but for others it reduces total intake.
Which is why, according to this OTHER Post article (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/breakfast-weight-control-diet/2021/11/19/a140b6b0-3cc8-11ec-8ee9-4f14a26749d1_story.html), "Breakfast really doesn’t have much to do with controlling your weight"
LOL. In 2021, "breakfast doesn't matter to your weight!" In 2022: "breakfast...eat it, and a lot of it, or be fat!"
This is why all of this diet/nutrition research has be taken with a grain of salt.
The problem is that a lot of the information is correct and well established: eat whole grains and vegetables, don't drink much if any sugary sodas, etc. But there are other areas where it's not clear, but the papers report on one study and make it sound definitive, then another study that says the opposite. Then people ignore it all, including the stuff we actually know is true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd believe that there's something to it, but it's not that cut-and-dried. For some people, skipping breakfast leads to overeating later, but for others it reduces total intake.
Which is why, according to this OTHER Post article (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/breakfast-weight-control-diet/2021/11/19/a140b6b0-3cc8-11ec-8ee9-4f14a26749d1_story.html), "Breakfast really doesn’t have much to do with controlling your weight"
LOL. In 2021, "breakfast doesn't matter to your weight!" In 2022: "breakfast...eat it, and a lot of it, or be fat!"
This is why all of this diet/nutrition research has be taken with a grain of salt.
Anonymous wrote:I'd believe that there's something to it, but it's not that cut-and-dried. For some people, skipping breakfast leads to overeating later, but for others it reduces total intake.
Which is why, according to this OTHER Post article (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/breakfast-weight-control-diet/2021/11/19/a140b6b0-3cc8-11ec-8ee9-4f14a26749d1_story.html), "Breakfast really doesn’t have much to do with controlling your weight"
Anonymous wrote:How do Italians do it then? They eat completely backwards and are much less heavy than us. All the walking?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not a criticism of OP sharing this, just does the Wash Post think they just stumbled upon something new? This is hardly new information about weight control. I remember the old adage, "eat like a king at breakfast, a prince at lunch, and a pauper at dinner".
My dad always used to quote me that. I agree it's not new but there's a lot of people posting on this forum saying they skip breakfast and some then saying they have trouble stopping eating at lunch and dinner as a result. It does'nt matter how many of us say, eat small regular meals, if something turns up in an article from a verifiable source, they're more likely to take note.
I think they skip the typical breakfast time, but are still breaking their fast ( break-fast) no matter when they eat their first meal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not a criticism of OP sharing this, just does the Wash Post think they just stumbled upon something new? This is hardly new information about weight control. I remember the old adage, "eat like a king at breakfast, a prince at lunch, and a pauper at dinner".
My dad always used to quote me that. I agree it's not new but there's a lot of people posting on this forum saying they skip breakfast and some then saying they have trouble stopping eating at lunch and dinner as a result. It does'nt matter how many of us say, eat small regular meals, if something turns up in an article from a verifiable source, they're more likely to take note.
Anonymous wrote:Not a criticism of OP sharing this, just does the Wash Post think they just stumbled upon something new? This is hardly new information about weight control. I remember the old adage, "eat like a king at breakfast, a prince at lunch, and a pauper at dinner".