Anonymous wrote:It is absolutely tethered to a fear that West End SB members will actually represent their constituency, despite those representatives currently in lock step with the horrifying status quo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only people clamoring for wards are geriatric Old Town republicans who are still ticked off that silberberg went up in flames. All a strict ward system does is make things even more provincial.
Huh? There are plenty of posts in the school and local politics forums re how it is systematically racist for the City of Alexandria NOT to have wards for their city council. I even remember someone recently going into the history of how wards were eliminated to prevent POC from getting elected.
You can’t have it both ways.
The SB and school district must think that nobody on the West End will work with the ACLU to bring a temporary restraining order/seek to enjoin this move by claiming that it will have a discriminatory effect (no intent needed when trying to show disparate impact). Any favorable decision might also affect the wardless elections for council seats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only people clamoring for wards are geriatric Old Town republicans who are still ticked off that silberberg went up in flames. All a strict ward system does is make things even more provincial.
Huh? There are plenty of posts in the school and local politics forums re how it is systematically racist for the City of Alexandria NOT to have wards for their city council. I even remember someone recently going into the history of how wards were eliminated to prevent POC from getting elected.
You can’t have it both ways.
Anonymous wrote:The only people clamoring for wards are geriatric Old Town republicans who are still ticked off that silberberg went up in flames. All a strict ward system does is make things even more provincial.
Anonymous wrote:I'm generally critical of all things ACPS and school board, but I'm somewhat in favor of removing districts and staggering elections. For some reason District C hasn't had a competitive race in the past 2, maybe 3 cycles. And it's why we continue to have a school board member/chair that chooses to keep her kids out of a school district she oversees. I find that appalling, and would love to have a chance to voice that at the ballot box. Staggering the elections could get us more timely change of members, and let us see some sort of accountability for actions that are taken on a yearly basis, and not allow them to skate by when people have forgotten terrible decisions they made 2 or 3 years prior. It might also inspire better candidates to run based on timely issues, rather than just chance it every 3 years.
Anonymous wrote:As a PP wrote - if this aligns with the rest of the state, that's a good thing. Just like we should have wards to align with the rest of the state (and get rid of the systemically racist at large system we have now).