Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is an article about the risks
https://www.publichealthpost.org/viewpoints/egg-donation-risk-and-reward/
Where’s the data?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the article above:
“ Egg donors have reported long-term effects including aggressive breast cancer, loss of fertility, and fatal colon cancer, sometimes occurring just a few years after donation. Without any family history of these illnesses, they suspect their egg donation as the cause. However, without scientific research, no one can confirm or deny a causal association between the medical procedure of egg donation and any reported long-term effect.”
So there’s no actual data that donating eggs is harmful? How can that be? Egg donations have been happening for decades.
If that’s true then all the women who undergo IVF wound be equally at risk. More so, since many women go through multiple cycles.
Anonymous wrote:Here is an article about the risks
https://www.publichealthpost.org/viewpoints/egg-donation-risk-and-reward/
Anonymous wrote:From the article above:
“ Egg donors have reported long-term effects including aggressive breast cancer, loss of fertility, and fatal colon cancer, sometimes occurring just a few years after donation. Without any family history of these illnesses, they suspect their egg donation as the cause. However, without scientific research, no one can confirm or deny a causal association between the medical procedure of egg donation and any reported long-term effect.”
So there’s no actual data that donating eggs is harmful? How can that be? Egg donations have been happening for decades.
Anonymous wrote:I think so. There is too much of a cancer risk. I can’t willingly pay someone to go through a process that has a risk of causing them cancer.
Anonymous wrote:Here is an article about the risks
https://www.publichealthpost.org/viewpoints/egg-donation-risk-and-reward/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve often thought that the way to make it more ethical is to let the donor have a percentage of the eggs to freeze for her own use. That way she gets more than just money out of it
Op: the agency we’re looking at actually does this. It’s called cofertility. I thought the same.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve often thought that the way to make it more ethical is to let the donor have a percentage of the eggs to freeze for her own use. That way she gets more than just money out of it
Anonymous wrote:I think so. There is too much of a cancer risk. I can’t willingly pay someone to go through a process that has a risk of causing them cancer.