Anonymous wrote:Construction costs are 1.5-2x a more traditional home. We’re in the same boat, so I’m interested in other viewpoints. DH is a home builder and for a colonial we’d budget about $150/SF for construction (at builders cost, not retail), for a contemporary, we’re budgeting around $250/SF and trying to manage to budget carefully to keep it that “low”. DH thinks it may swell to more like $325/SF We don’t do ANY contemporary homes, so part of the increased cost would be outsourcing more than usual.
Just to be really clear though- we have actually BUILT colonials in the $2-2.8 range at $150-175 per SF, including the wolf range and hardie siding, shingles (not slate/faux slate), Andersen 400s, wired for speakers, theater room, etc. etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We found a good teardown lot. Husband is keen on doing a modern style house (flat roof, rectangular shape, lots of floor to ceiling windows, etc). Besides the challenge of resale, increased energy costs, anything else we should be aware of?
Ooooh, Id be careful with flat roofs, the build up of snow and leaves with nowhere to go (no arch allowing them to slide off) creates a mess of deterioration of your roof after just 3 - 5 years.
How do builders that build modern homes combat that?
Anonymous wrote:I adore that style of architecture. But it belongs in the woods. There’s nothing worse than a gorgeous modern house stuck into a neighborhood where either you have curtains drawn all the time or it’s a fishbowl.
The most beautiful house in the world will look terrible in the wrong setting. A suburban neighborhood is probably the wrong setting.
There are a few exceptions in the area - tucked into wooded hillsides in Silver Spring or backing to rock creek park, or that one neighborhood with all the cute modern houses down towards Mt Vernon somewhere that has big, wooded lots.
Most of the time though it ends up looking terrible.
Anonymous wrote:We found a good teardown lot. Husband is keen on doing a modern style house (flat roof, rectangular shape, lots of floor to ceiling windows, etc). Besides the challenge of resale, increased energy costs, anything else we should be aware of?
Anonymous wrote:How it's built will impact energy efficiency. Window coverings, for both privacy and protection of the interior against UV, will be expensive. Tear-down lots are in mixed neighborhoods - bigger houses interspersed with smaller, older homes, some of which may not be well-maintained and whose occupants may not have much in common with you. Renters may occupy less expensive properties nearby, which sometimes results in less care of the property and less desirable occupant behavior. There probably won't be a HOA, so local eyesores will go unaddressed. Zoning and lot size may limit home features (e.g., number of garage spaces) and size, which can impact resale for upper bracket homes.
Beware of drainage considerations with a flat lot which is not graded to promote water run-off. Drainage (and snow) is also a consideration for flat roofs.