Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're going to love it when the buses are full of homeless people.
I've been on buses with homeless people and I'm ok with it.
not buses with homeless people. buses FULL of homeless people. they would become de facto homeless shelters.
Then maybe we need to do better with our homeless shelters if they're choosing a bus over the shelter.
But I also don't believe your hyperbole.
Believe whatever you like, but our city is hostile to homeless people and warm buses will look like a pretty good sleeping option to many, all things considered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're going to love it when the buses are full of homeless people.
I've been on buses with homeless people and I'm ok with it.
not buses with homeless people. buses FULL of homeless people. they would become de facto homeless shelters.
Then maybe we need to do better with our homeless shelters if they're choosing a bus over the shelter.
But I also don't believe your hyperbole.
Have you visited DC public libraries lately?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're going to love it when the buses are full of homeless people.
I've been on buses with homeless people and I'm ok with it.
not buses with homeless people. buses FULL of homeless people. they would become de facto homeless shelters.
Then maybe we need to do better with our homeless shelters if they're choosing a bus over the shelter.
But I also don't believe your hyperbole.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're going to love it when the buses are full of homeless people.
I've been on buses with homeless people and I'm ok with it.
not buses with homeless people. buses FULL of homeless people. they would become de facto homeless shelters.
Then maybe we need to do better with our homeless shelters if they're choosing a bus over the shelter.
But I also don't believe your hyperbole.
Anonymous wrote:I'm for reduced bus fares, but there should be some charge for it. People doesn't always value something that is free (and trash it, actually). Given that DC is facing a fiscal challenge (see Williams, Anthony), I'd rather see DC use scarce transit resources to expand Circulator and Metrobus routes rather than make substandard service free to all.
Anonymous wrote:Just to be clear. It is not free. You are or will be paying via your tax bill. If it helps with fare jumpers, probably a good thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're going to love it when the buses are full of homeless people.
I've been on buses with homeless people and I'm ok with it.
not buses with homeless people. buses FULL of homeless people. they would become de facto homeless shelters.
Anonymous wrote:It would be better if our government focused on real problems.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're going to love it when the buses are full of homeless people.
I've been on buses with homeless people and I'm ok with it.
Anonymous wrote:You're going to love it when the buses are full of homeless people.