Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t base any decisions off of iReady.
I would. It was the only indicator coming from FCPS that showed dyslexia. I would avoid the reading specialist and get private evaluation. FCPS will continue to lie as long as they can about reading issues.
Sadly, the majority of school systems do this
NP. Do you have any recommendations for a private evaluation for dyslexia?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t base any decisions off of iReady.
I would. It was the only indicator coming from FCPS that showed dyslexia. I would avoid the reading specialist and get private evaluation. FCPS will continue to lie as long as they can about reading issues.
Sadly, the majority of school systems do this
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t base any decisions off of iReady.
I would. It was the only indicator coming from FCPS that showed dyslexia. I would avoid the reading specialist and get private evaluation. FCPS will continue to lie as long as they can about reading issues.
Sadly, the majority of school systems do this
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t base any decisions off of iReady.
I would. It was the only indicator coming from FCPS that showed dyslexia. I would avoid the reading specialist and get private evaluation. FCPS will continue to lie as long as they can about reading issues.
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t base any decisions off of iReady.
Anonymous wrote:The iReady test is awful. Kids just click through without trying. The results are rubbish for many kids.