Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think your DH has a limited view of team sports. I've done soccer, softball, swimming, cross-country, track, and rowing at various levels and by far the strongest sense of team I felt was cross-country, with rowing a close second.
The traditional team sports I did included a crap ton of competition for playing time, irritation with "lesser" players, and coach favoritism. In the so-called "individual" sports, it was easier to be supportive of each other, maybe because "team" wasn't crammed down our throats in the same way.
tl;dr - your DH is wrong
I agree these are a team sports cons, but I also think it's good for kids to experience these dynamics and learn coping mechanisms as there is a good chance you will run into them as an adult too in the working world.
Anonymous wrote:I think your DH has a limited view of team sports. I've done soccer, softball, swimming, cross-country, track, and rowing at various levels and by far the strongest sense of team I felt was cross-country, with rowing a close second.
The traditional team sports I did included a crap ton of competition for playing time, irritation with "lesser" players, and coach favoritism. In the so-called "individual" sports, it was easier to be supportive of each other, maybe because "team" wasn't crammed down our throats in the same way.
tl;dr - your DH is wrong
Anonymous wrote:I think playing team sports can teach kids a lot. But individual sports are good too and most still have a team element to them. My oldest did cross country and track in HS and there was definitely a team element to those with the kids learning how to support and encourage each other.
I played only team sports growing up but doing a sport where you could more easily set your own goals and monitor your programs always seemed appealing to me. I'm thinking like running or swimming where you could work towards getting faster.