Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here, appreciate the opinions. Apparently I’m in the minority.
I see both sides. It sends a bad message to other players, especially those who don't start, when they get there on time and starters don't. However, if there is a 5 p.m. practice, that can be tough for many parents. Usually, younger kids practice at this time, which means that being late is almost entirely in the parents, so I can understand why you wouldn't punish the kid. If the kids are older and driving themselves, that's a different story.
My pet peeve through years of travel soccer is players who show up late on game day. They absolutely should not start.
Anonymous wrote:OP here, appreciate the opinions. Apparently I’m in the minority.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get where it comes from, but unless they’re 16 they don’t have a lot of control.
Right but the parents do and this motivates the parents. The only problem I could see is if the 5 practice is something wildly different than what you signed up for.
Anonymous wrote:I get where it comes from, but unless they’re 16 they don’t have a lot of control.
Anonymous wrote:Within reason, yes. Not starting doesn’t mean you can’t get plenty of playing time later. My kids have had a number of coaches who use this rule, but have never seen it enforced where the parent reached out in advance to let the coach know heir child would be late. See their kid sit on the bench to start the game can be a powerful motivator for some parents to take practice seriously.
From a more practical standpoint, parents who are chronically late to practices often cut it close on arriving for games as well, and their kids end up needing to warm up on the sidelines before they’re ready to go in. No coach is going to set themselves up to scramble for a change in starting line up when Larla still isn’t at the field 5 minutes before game time. They would prefer to start people they can count on to show up.