Anonymous wrote:You want their thinking and definitely no photos of them. Photo examples I used were a variety of “robots” my child build and I typed his thoughts on his robots next to the pictures. He also used to make paper airplanes and design them very specifically so I took pictures of them and included his thoughts on the names of each plane, how he made them, and why they flew the way they did (IE the plane named Lightning was folded long ways and a straight point and it was the fastest plane).
In the end, I don’t think samples matter much anymore. I think it’s all about the GBRS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don’t include photos of kid doing activity. Rather show the critical thinking or thought process kid got to outcome. Result photo is ok but usually doesn’t need kid in photo. A kid in photo is using real estate ineffectively. You need to use space that exhibit exceptional advanced thinking. Look at fcps aap Twitter. It’s an awesome feed.
+1. Plus, cringe. What does a photo of your kid doing homework, playing and instrument or playing a sport do? Show you have a cute kid?a big part of Varsity Blues was the inclusion of photos of kids doing activities the didn’t participate in in real life.
Pages with photos of the kid with his geography bee trophy, or whatever, should be shredded before they are seen by the committee. They don’t “prove” anything and they do play into unconscious biases based on race, sex, national origin, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Don’t include photos of kid doing activity. Rather show the critical thinking or thought process kid got to outcome. Result photo is ok but usually doesn’t need kid in photo. A kid in photo is using real estate ineffectively. You need to use space that exhibit exceptional advanced thinking. Look at fcps aap Twitter. It’s an awesome feed.
Anonymous wrote:Don’t include photos of kid doing activity. Rather show the critical thinking or thought process kid got to outcome. Result photo is ok but usually doesn’t need kid in photo. A kid in photo is using real estate ineffectively. You need to use space that exhibit exceptional advanced thinking. Look at fcps aap Twitter. It’s an awesome feed.