Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is Thomas’ rationale for not excusing himself?
Because there is no code of ethics for SCOTUS.
Roberts should have asked his to Recuse.
Roberts is a true believing POS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is Thomas’ rationale for not excusing himself?
Because there is no code of ethics for SCOTUS.
Roberts should have asked his to Recuse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is Thomas’ rationale for not excusing himself?
Because there is no code of ethics for SCOTUS.
Anonymous wrote:What is Thomas’ rationale for not excusing himself?
Anonymous wrote:Well to get to get around this you need to vote because the Democrats wanted to have more judicial transparency. Republicans all voted against it.
Anonymous wrote:It's called a shadow docket where one judge gets to make a decision for the entire court over the area. They are presiding.
Each have different areas of the country and Lindsey Graham lucked out to get Clarence Thomas overseeing his area.
No, it doesn't get him off the hook fully but it certainly does for quite a while.