Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think you can carry two federal plans on the same people simultaneously. When I was divorcing and we were removing my ex from my insurance to his own (also federal) plan the paperwork got messed up and they cancelled my insurance midway through the year due to dual enrollment. It was a total hassle to figure out
Thanks so much for this. I’ll dig into it.
I think this is accurate.
Does anyone know which federal insurance plan offers the best coverage for tons of out of network PT, OT, etc?
Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think you can carry two federal plans on the same people simultaneously. When I was divorcing and we were removing my ex from my insurance to his own (also federal) plan the paperwork got messed up and they cancelled my insurance midway through the year due to dual enrollment. It was a total hassle to figure out
Thanks so much for this. I’ll dig into it.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. This is very helpful.
I don’t think establishing medical necessity will be a problem (OT, PT, speech therapy for a toddler). He will have multiple appointments a week and we’ll wipe out the 60 visits in no time.
What’s the best way for me (someone who tries, but really doesn’t understand health insurance) to figure out what the best approach is as we head into open season when my spouse and I can select new coverage?
Anonymous wrote:I don't think you can carry two federal plans on the same people simultaneously. When I was divorcing and we were removing my ex from my insurance to his own (also federal) plan the paperwork got messed up and they cancelled my insurance midway through the year due to dual enrollment. It was a total hassle to figure out
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What you need to look at is the joint coverage provisions of the policies. Depending on the policies, you could have double the amount of coverage. Or you could have only the amount of the higher of the two policies. Coordination of coverage provisions are complicated. They can eliminate ate all of the benefits of double coverage, which would mean you still pay the same OOP but pay for an extra insurance policy.
I am an attorney who advised and litigated on this issue often. Know the policies you are buying. When it looks too good to be true, it probably is.
So, to clarify, I think you are talking about the number of visits, not the amount of reimbursement, right? Because even if you have joint coverage, you would still have to show that 120 PT visits/year were medically necessary.
For the actual costs of medically necessary care, I don't see how a secondary health insurance policy could just refuse to pay anything unreimbursed from the first policy. How would that make any sense?
An of course, another issue is all the paperwork. I assume this is out of network so OP will have to be submitted 2 claims for each visit. Total PITA even if you combine a bunch of visits on one claim form.
Anonymous wrote:What you need to look at is the joint coverage provisions of the policies. Depending on the policies, you could have double the amount of coverage. Or you could have only the amount of the higher of the two policies. Coordination of coverage provisions are complicated. They can eliminate ate all of the benefits of double coverage, which would mean you still pay the same OOP but pay for an extra insurance policy.
I am an attorney who advised and litigated on this issue often. Know the policies you are buying. When it looks too good to be true, it probably is.