Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parents and kids will always be the pawns in the political battles waged over public schools. The Democrats will bend over backwards to do the bidding of public school employees and the Republicans will wage holy war to demonize them. It’s all about which tactic will get the most votes; kids and families are just collateral damage.
Nope.
Democrats were managing risk with limited resources during a deadly pandemic, not trying to “get the most votes”.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Parents and kids will always be the pawns in the political battles waged over public schools. The Democrats will bend over backwards to do the bidding of public school employees and the Republicans will wage holy war to demonize them. It’s all about which tactic will get the most votes; kids and families are just collateral damage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sure he’d love any mechanism for a state takeover of ACPS schools.
Youngkin is not interesting in a state takeover of schools. He wants to implement for-profit private/charter schools and implement a voucher program to fund them with public money. His plan to accomplish this is to drive public schools so far into the ground (or at least make people believe they are absolutely terrible) so he can build public support for an alternative program that ultimately will benefit the wealthy at the expense of low-income students.
If it is at the expense of low-income students, why are so many low-income parents eager to send their kids to charter schools, and supporting vouchers to do so?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sure he’d love any mechanism for a state takeover of ACPS schools.
Youngkin is not interesting in a state takeover of schools. He wants to implement for-profit private/charter schools and implement a voucher program to fund them with public money. His plan to accomplish this is to drive public schools so far into the ground (or at least make people believe they are absolutely terrible) so he can build public support for an alternative program that ultimately will benefit the wealthy at the expense of low-income students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Youngkin is attacking the accreditation standards as too lenient and not reflective of current school academic performance (https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/09/23/youngkin-school-ratings/). With ACPS’s poor academic performance on the most recent SOLs, could some ACPS schools be at risk of losing accreditation if the standards are tightened and then Youngkin could use non-accreditation to exercise more control…..
Control to do what- make some charter schools?
Or are you asking because you are interested in having reduced tuition at say the saints or country day?
Vouchers would be great right- take away money from the poor and give it to the rich kids who are already accepted and can pay full tuition.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sure he’d love any mechanism for a state takeover of ACPS schools.
Youngkin is not interesting in a state takeover of schools. He wants to implement for-profit private/charter schools and implement a voucher program to fund them with public money. His plan to accomplish this is to drive public schools so far into the ground (or at least make people believe they are absolutely terrible) so he can build public support for an alternative program that ultimately will benefit the wealthy at the expense of low-income students.
Anonymous wrote:I’m sure he’d love any mechanism for a state takeover of ACPS schools.
Anonymous wrote:Youngkin is attacking the accreditation standards as too lenient and not reflective of current school academic performance (https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/09/23/youngkin-school-ratings/). With ACPS’s poor academic performance on the most recent SOLs, could some ACPS schools be at risk of losing accreditation if the standards are tightened and then Youngkin could use non-accreditation to exercise more control…..