Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it’s cool for the mostly white male coaches to get millions and the schools to get hundreds of millions, but the athletes, many of whom are POC and/or poor shouldn’t get any of the revenue they create because it might make their connection to the school more … tenuous?
I see you.
People don’t watch college football and basketball to see the athletes or to see the game played at the highest level. They watch because the players represent the school and the community. They live on campus, they attend classes on campus, they share the campus experience. The fans love the campus, not the players. When that is lost—and it will be once student-athletes are paid—“college” sports will become just another professional sports league in direct competition with the NFL and NBA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It will mean the end of women’s college sports.
I think some women athletes have done quite well with NIL.
And Title 9 would still apply wouldn't it?
Anonymous wrote:It will mean the end of women’s college sports.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it’s cool for the mostly white male coaches to get millions and the schools to get hundreds of millions, but the athletes, many of whom are POC and/or poor shouldn’t get any of the revenue they create because it might make their connection to the school more … tenuous?
I see you.
People don’t watch college football and basketball to see the athletes or to see the game played at the highest level. They watch because the players represent the school and the community. They live on campus, they attend classes on campus, they share the campus experience. The fans love the campus, not the players. When that is lost—and it will be once student-athletes are paid—“college” sports will become just another professional sports league in direct competition with the NFL and NBA.
You are insane
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it’s cool for the mostly white male coaches to get millions and the schools to get hundreds of millions, but the athletes, many of whom are POC and/or poor shouldn’t get any of the revenue they create because it might make their connection to the school more … tenuous?
I see you.
People don’t watch college football and basketball to see the athletes or to see the game played at the highest level. They watch because the players represent the school and the community. They live on campus, they attend classes on campus, they share the campus experience. The fans love the campus, not the players. When that is lost—and it will be once student-athletes are paid—“college” sports will become just another professional sports league in direct competition with the NFL and NBA.
Anonymous wrote:Where do you stand on paying college football and basketball players? (Or any other sport with market demand?)
Personally, I’m against it and I actually wish the NCAA would force schools to reduce practice hours so that student-athletes would have enough time to go to class and get their schoolwork done. If the quality of play on the field or court diminishes a little bit, who cares? Fans don’t show up because they want to see football/basketball played at the highest level. (They have the NFL/NBA for that.) They show up because they have something in common with the players: They lived in the same dorms and went to classes in the same buildings etc.
I think paid student-athletes will quickly lose *any* connection to the school. They won’t ever go to class or graduate and “college” football/basketball will inevitably become another professional league in direct competition with the NFL and NBA. Fans will eventually realize that they’re rooting for the Georgia Bulldogs or the Alabama Crimson Tide for absolutely no logical reason whatsoever. The players will *only* set foot on campus to play in the games and that’s it. They will have no other connection to the school at all.
Analysts have predicted that the Big Ten could command up to $1 billion combined from all its media deals after adding USC and UCLA starting in 2024.[/quote]
https://www.si.com/fannation/college/cfb-hq/ncaa-football/college-football-news-realignment-big-ten-espn-tv-network
College sport is big money, the athletes are not valued by the schools, NCAA or coaches. At the minimum every athlete should get work study. The revenues sports athletes should be bid on by the schools.
Anonymous wrote:So it’s cool for the mostly white male coaches to get millions and the schools to get hundreds of millions, but the athletes, many of whom are POC and/or poor shouldn’t get any of the revenue they create because it might make their connection to the school more … tenuous?
I see you.