Anonymous wrote:Battlefield is trying to include as many Fx teams and privates on their schedule this year. Talking to their assistant and he is pushing for the toughest schedule possible. Team lost 10 seniors but lots of talent still left. Also said look for aggressive and physical team play this year thinks that was one of the things that beat them in finals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:for what its worth, in the Fall Woodson League, Yorktown fell to PVI on Sunday and Dominion (4A) beat Battlefield
Too piggie back off of this, and I’m not saying this would have been the difference to win the game. But, Battlefield was missing quite a few key players, such as their phenomenal sophomore attacker and their All-State goalie
Anonymous wrote:WIW is probably zero. (Pre) Fall Ball games played in August mean about as much as NFL pre-season games (or even less considering the season is 7 months away), so I wouldn't worry on results. Most teams are not full strength and usually use the fall to give young/new players a look, get rust off, etc.
As for the crystal ball, agree on Oakton. May be right there with Yorktown based on what they have coming back. Disagree on Woodson. They return their best players from last year, so the expectations are high.
Agree the jury is still out on some traditional powers that lost a lot from last year. I expect they will get there by the season as there still is some talent returning, but it will depend on how they replace the losses. I expect hiccups with some of them along the way.
Battlefield is always the exception and hard to read. I think they are a really good team, but they just don't have the competition in Regions A and B to sharpen them when it matters. Maybe Freedom or JC can challenge them, but I would not be surprised with another VHSL runner-up trophy in their trophy case next Spring.
Anonymous wrote:WIW is probably zero. (Pre) Fall Ball games played in August mean about as much as NFL pre-season games (or even less considering the season is 7 months away), so I wouldn't worry on results. Most teams are not full strength and usually use the fall to give young/new players a look, get rust off, etc.
As for the crystal ball, agree on Oakton. May be right there with Yorktown based on what they have coming back. Disagree on Woodson. They return their best players from last year, so the expectations are high.
Agree the jury is still out on some traditional powers that lost a lot from last year. I expect they will get there by the season as there still is some talent returning, but it will depend on how they replace the losses. I expect hiccups with some of them along the way.
Battlefield is always the exception and hard to read. I think they are a really good team, but they just don't have the competition in Regions A and B to sharpen them when it matters. Maybe Freedom or JC can challenge them, but I would not be surprised with another VHSL runner-up trophy in their trophy case next Spring.
Anonymous wrote:for what its worth, in the Fall Woodson League, Yorktown fell to PVI on Sunday and Dominion (4A) beat Battlefield
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's one for discussion -- how many VHSL teams would finish above .500 if they played in the ISL AA?
Okay, I'll play....Using last spring's teams: I think that class leaders of 6A (Yorktown/Langley) would go at least 5-3 if either of them were the 9th team in the league. Not so sure the other 6A teams like Oakton/Madison could beat .500. 4A Dominion would likely go 5-3 as well. Not certain about 5A Riverside, probably 4-4. Lots of scores and match ups from last year to use for comparison. For Sping 2023, I have no idea. Of course you never know, teams always have "off" days and some "perfect" days.
Anonymous wrote:Here's one for discussion -- how many VHSL teams would finish above .500 if they played in the ISL AA?
Anonymous wrote:Here's one for discussion -- how many VHSL teams would finish above .500 if they played in the ISL AA?