Anonymous wrote:I was a case worker for mentally I’ll older people, and things are much more stable for people who own their home. People who rent or live in governement housing can be evicted, and landlords will work to evict mentally ill people who are disruptive, don’t pay the rent, frighten others, hoard, etc. You can’t take away someone’s housing for those things if they own it!
Could you buy her a tiny house so she’ll have a place to live? That would reduce substantially her risk of homelessness.
As a PP said, I institutionalization isn’t a thing anymore for the mentally ill. It is for the developmentally delayed or those with physical impairments that prevent self care (like eating and toileting). She should already be on disability - if not, work on that.
Anonymous wrote:aAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My point is, having paranoia or calling the cops doesn't actually preclude someone from living alone. I'm not saying it's an ideal circumstance, of course it's not. but without knowing more about someone's level of functioning in actually taking care of themselves it's hard to know. And basically there aren't many long term facilities for someone with persistent mental illness. Those that exist are very expensive. Most live with family, or if not live somehow subsidized on their own ideally with some wraparound services. This is why we have such a problem with homelessness with folks suffering from persistent mental illness. There just aren't adequate supports.
+1. No matter what path, it’s going to be a hard life. But many people in her shoes live alone. I think the Britney Spears situation has given people the wrong idea about when people are truly too impaired to be independent (and as a result need a conservatorship or other intervention). It takes much much MUCH more profound impairment than you describe OP.
Agreed pp, the britney situation is truly bizarre - it usually takes a pretty extreme circumstance to get conservatorship and even if you do it still doesn't mean they can just be "committed." The idea of this comes from old movies and times before the 70s when our approach to mental health radically changed (for better or worse, some better - some worse)
aAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My point is, having paranoia or calling the cops doesn't actually preclude someone from living alone. I'm not saying it's an ideal circumstance, of course it's not. but without knowing more about someone's level of functioning in actually taking care of themselves it's hard to know. And basically there aren't many long term facilities for someone with persistent mental illness. Those that exist are very expensive. Most live with family, or if not live somehow subsidized on their own ideally with some wraparound services. This is why we have such a problem with homelessness with folks suffering from persistent mental illness. There just aren't adequate supports.
+1. No matter what path, it’s going to be a hard life. But many people in her shoes live alone. I think the Britney Spears situation has given people the wrong idea about when people are truly too impaired to be independent (and as a result need a conservatorship or other intervention). It takes much much MUCH more profound impairment than you describe OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My point is, having paranoia or calling the cops doesn't actually preclude someone from living alone. I'm not saying it's an ideal circumstance, of course it's not. but without knowing more about someone's level of functioning in actually taking care of themselves it's hard to know. And basically there aren't many long term facilities for someone with persistent mental illness. Those that exist are very expensive. Most live with family, or if not live somehow subsidized on their own ideally with some wraparound services. This is why we have such a problem with homelessness with folks suffering from persistent mental illness. There just aren't adequate supports.
+1. No matter what path, it’s going to be a hard life. But many people in her shoes live alone. I think the Britney Spears situation has given people the wrong idea about when people are truly too impaired to be independent (and as a result need a conservatorship or other intervention). It takes much much MUCH more profound impairment than you describe OP.
Anonymous wrote:My point is, having paranoia or calling the cops doesn't actually preclude someone from living alone. I'm not saying it's an ideal circumstance, of course it's not. but without knowing more about someone's level of functioning in actually taking care of themselves it's hard to know. And basically there aren't many long term facilities for someone with persistent mental illness. Those that exist are very expensive. Most live with family, or if not live somehow subsidized on their own ideally with some wraparound services. This is why we have such a problem with homelessness with folks suffering from persistent mental illness. There just aren't adequate supports.