Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you go to work in a shirt that had a rip in it?
A scratch on the car or a dent doesn't impact the safety or drive-ability of a car. Who are people concerned will "see" them in such a car and think less (?) of them? It's a very odd paranoia. Or at least one I don't fully understand. I assume it's some old-timey class stereotype.
No, it isn't some "old-timey class stereotype." If anything, the stereotype is that old money cares less about having a cosmetically perfect car than strivers.
I live in a place with plenty of old money. They almost all drive freshly detailed European luxury SUVs, sports cars, Teslas, 4-door Mini Coopers, and Suburbans.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you go to work in a shirt that had a rip in it?
A scratch on the car or a dent doesn't impact the safety or drive-ability of a car. Who are people concerned will "see" them in such a car and think less (?) of them? It's a very odd paranoia. Or at least one I don't fully understand. I assume it's some old-timey class stereotype.
No, it isn't some "old-timey class stereotype." If anything, the stereotype is that old money cares less about having a cosmetically perfect car than strivers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you go to work in a shirt that had a rip in it?
A scratch on the car or a dent doesn't impact the safety or drive-ability of a car. Who are people concerned will "see" them in such a car and think less (?) of them? It's a very odd paranoia. Or at least one I don't fully understand. I assume it's some old-timey class stereotype.
Anonymous wrote:Would you go to work in a shirt that had a rip in it?
Anonymous wrote:Are you sure she was raised affluent? IMO, the people who are the most concerned about things like this are the ones who weren't raised wealthy and have something to "prove."
Anonymous wrote:My baby boomer mom was like this too. Spotless car, always, and traded it in for a new one every year.