Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was going to vote for Reimer but now I'm considering Elrich. Is it going to be a close election, Elrich vs Blair? I'm certainly not voting Blair. What a disaster. He should just be a Republican.
What about Blair’s platform screams Republican to you?
https://www.blairformontgomery.com/vision
Anonymous wrote:I was going to vote for Reimer but now I'm considering Elrich. Is it going to be a close election, Elrich vs Blair? I'm certainly not voting Blair. What a disaster. He should just be a Republican.
Anonymous wrote:So annoying when votes are presumed “wasted” because 1) the candidate might be a long shot or 2) you don’t like him.
Do you want every race to have only two candidates?
Anonymous wrote:You wasted a vote that could have gone to Blair.
Anonymous wrote:I voted for that Peter guy
Anonymous wrote:So annoying someone on this board shows up every day making this same argument. You aren’t going to win a MoCo election by posting on this board, esp not this same tired argument.
Anonymous wrote:So annoying when votes are presumed “wasted” because 1) the candidate might be a long shot or 2) you don’t like him.
Do you want every race to have only two candidates?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So annoying when votes are presumed “wasted” because 1) the candidate might be a long shot or 2) you don’t like him.
Do you want every race to have only two candidates?
Reality sucks -- People voted for Gary Johnson because they couldn't stand Hillary or Trump. Or just on principle. And that's why we have a botched Supreme Court. Or Ralph Nader throwing the super-tight election from Gore to Bush.
What we NEED is ranked choice voting.
Anonymous wrote:So annoying when votes are presumed “wasted” because 1) the candidate might be a long shot or 2) you don’t like him.
Do you want every race to have only two candidates?