Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Instead why not build a bridge up north by White's Ferry? Why are we adding more cars to the road, have you not heard of induced demand?
I'll give you my take. I'd like to see a series of small bridges. White's Ferry area being one of them. Maybe they can expand Points of Rock.
The truth is they really should seriously consider expanding the Purple Line West from Bethesda to Vienna.
Expanding highway lanes is doomed to failure. It NEVER worked in Los Angeles. Billions wasted and the automobile traffic is still there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL. Do you people just have a random collection of buzzwords in your head that you spit out? “Induced Demand”, such as it is a thing, is not relevant for HOT Lanes.
There will be no change to bridge congestion for ordinary traffic. However, for those willing to pay the variable priced toll, you will be able to pass through relatively easily and thus increasing overall capacity.
This is not exclude the fact that another crossing is necessary. If they extend 370 it’s easy to see how it could cross a bit north of Bretton Woods and connect with 28 and provide a direct shot to Dulles.
And that’s why it won’t happen any time soon. Maryland owns all of the river and would need to pay for bridge that would potential undermine BWI.
Please cite one example where lane expansion "solved" a traffic congestion problem.
Hint, you can't because it has never happened.
Anonymous wrote:LOL. Do you people just have a random collection of buzzwords in your head that you spit out? “Induced Demand”, such as it is a thing, is not relevant for HOT Lanes.
There will be no change to bridge congestion for ordinary traffic. However, for those willing to pay the variable priced toll, you will be able to pass through relatively easily and thus increasing overall capacity.
This is not exclude the fact that another crossing is necessary. If they extend 370 it’s easy to see how it could cross a bit north of Bretton Woods and connect with 28 and provide a direct shot to Dulles.
And that’s why it won’t happen any time soon. Maryland owns all of the river and would need to pay for bridge that would potential undermine BWI.
Anonymous wrote:HOT lanes are a mistake. Expanding the bridge is a mistake. They both add to the traffic problems rather than solving them.
Anonymous wrote:You all are funny. People in MoCo are ALREADY driving over 495 to take Dulles. A bridge or series of bridges does not change that.
Anonymous wrote:HOT lanes are a mistake. Expanding the bridge is a mistake. They both add to the traffic problems rather than solving them.
Anonymous wrote:New bridge and bridge expansion. If I were a dictator this would happen. But I’m not so it won’t. Regarding BWI, it is a LCC airport. It has basically no international. It doesn’t compete much with Dulles.
Anonymous wrote:LOL. Do you people just have a random collection of buzzwords in your head that you spit out? “Induced Demand”, such as it is a thing, is not relevant for HOT Lanes.
There will be no change to bridge congestion for ordinary traffic. However, for those willing to pay the variable priced toll, you will be able to pass through relatively easily and thus increasing overall capacity.
This is not exclude the fact that another crossing is necessary. If they extend 370 it’s easy to see how it could cross a bit north of Bretton Woods and connect with 28 and provide a direct shot to Dulles.
And that’s why it won’t happen any time soon. Maryland owns all of the river and would need to pay for bridge that would potential undermine BWI.
Anonymous wrote:Instead why not build a bridge up north by White's Ferry? Why are we adding more cars to the road, have you not heard of induced demand?