Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The rest will follow Columbia 's lead and decline USNews. Columbia has the clout.
Uh this is not something new at all.
It has happened in the past repeatedly.
Some got lucky and not caught yet.
Berkeley
https://www.berkeleyside.org/2019/07/28/uc-berkeley-kicked-off-the-u-s-news-world-report-rankings-of-best-u-s-colleges
Emory
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/08/20/emory-misreported-admissions-data-more-decade
This is exactly the mindset that has kids and parents foaming at the mouth. We don't need these silly rankings that are intended to drive sales because most schools accept 50-75% of their applicants. The obsession with the same 20-30 schools is out of control so I understand why schools have been playing games. These lists are full of fiction.The CDS is an useless piece of aggregated nonsense. What you really need is the govt to compel universities to submit disaggregated data on applicants, admitted, scores, ratings etc by interest group: legacy, athletes, by race, by gender, by geography and by citizenship. Without Govt compulsion the universities will never reveal this because it will show the kind of shenanigans going on in admissions at almost every school.
Anonymous wrote:The rest will follow Columbia 's lead and decline USNews. Columbia has the clout.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would love to see the rankings go away
Or evolve to allowing each individual student to create their own personalized ranking based on factors that matter to them.
Anonymous wrote:The rest will follow Columbia 's lead and decline USNews. Columbia has the clout.
Anonymous wrote:They haven't made their Common Data Set public for years, maybe ever? Makes one wonder what others--like the University of Chicago and Johns Hopkins--who won't make their data public are hiding.
Anonymous wrote:I would love to see the rankings go away