Trump has shown that there is a whole underbelly of the American population who can be easily monetized for your continued wealth.

Were any if the people on this show tough enough to accept the results of an election they lost?

I've enjoyed many Netflix shows...but I'm supposed to reach some kind of profound understanding of politics based on something a network that made a show about a baby with antlers (or somesuch, I didn't watch) is producing?

Anonymous wrote:Sorry but I have lost track...the the cons the snowflakes or the libs?

The cons and trumpscum have always been the snowflakes.

It’s just one show on Netflix of the thousands they have aired, produced, considered or have in development. Maybe don’t give it this much importance?

Anonymous wrote:Sorry but I have lost track...the the cons the snowflakes or the libs?

My question is has Netflix read the tea leaves and see that broader society is tired of liberal snowflake antics or does network know it’s just going broke, losing stockholder value, and kind of signaling a shift that it’s taking an edgier route out of some weird attempt at a rebrand? It’s just a weird show, but I’m curious if they have some kind of Neilson polling system that tells them that this show would do well in this climate.

Sorry but I have lost track...the the cons the snowflakes or the libs?

This show is obviously tailored towards conservatives. A bunch of snowflakes who complain about everything being ridiculed in a fake reality show set in the woods with two veterans as guides?

Netflix is dipping their toe in the cultural wars pool to stay relevant. Or are they more in tune with ratings and a societal backlash against all the perceived complaining, identity politics and endless grievance culture? I am curious how this how got made. November is going to be an electoral mess for democrats. Is America simply fed up with humorless liberals at this point and has assumed their role in producing humor that challenges the status quo?