Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day jurors tend to value documentary evidence over just about anything else. Heard created quite a bit of live-time documentary evidence, some of which were troubling, but her claims were far more severe than what she could prove up with documentary evidence, despite what looked like a concerted effort to create a record at the time. That's why she lost. Not because of the testimony, because of the documentary record.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe Johnny either. Two druggie abusers. Yuck.
I think when he's sober, he's lovely. I think she encouraged his drug abuse and drinking with her difficult behavior, and I can see him being abusive then. Not to the degree she stated, but throwing a wine bottle or punching a wall near her head or something.
Anonymous wrote:The misogyny of the coverage (and observers) disgusted me. Is she an angel? Obviously not. Did she deserve the nasty portrayal she received? I also don’t think so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe Johnny either. Two druggie abusers. Yuck.
I think when he's sober, he's lovely. I think she encouraged his drug abuse and drinking with her difficult behavior, and I can see him being abusive then. Not to the degree she stated, but throwing a wine bottle or punching a wall near her head or something.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe Johnny either. Two druggie abusers. Yuck.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe Johnny either. Two druggie abusers. Yuck.