jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the Washington Post’s editorial board doesn’t reflect Washingtonians or in particular Ward 3 voters then it will come out in the vote. I am not sure why it gets everyone so upset.
Same. There are people/groups who've endorsed candidates I don't like. The members of those groups don't all live in DC. But they can endorse who they like.
Nobody says they can't have opinions or endorse who they like. They can do those things. But, let's be honest that DFER money is dark money from outside DC and Post opinions about DC are written by a Maryland resident. Just like I don't like Congress interfering in DC's affairs, I am not a fan of non-DC millionaires or Maryland commuters intervening. Your mileage may vary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the Washington Post’s editorial board doesn’t reflect Washingtonians or in particular Ward 3 voters then it will come out in the vote. I am not sure why it gets everyone so upset.
Same. There are people/groups who've endorsed candidates I don't like. The members of those groups don't all live in DC. But they can endorse who they like.
Anonymous wrote:If the Washington Post’s editorial board doesn’t reflect Washingtonians or in particular Ward 3 voters then it will come out in the vote. I am not sure why it gets everyone so upset.
Anonymous wrote:If the Washington Post’s editorial board doesn’t reflect Washingtonians or in particular Ward 3 voters then it will come out in the vote. I am not sure why it gets everyone so upset.
Anonymous wrote:If the Washington Post’s editorial board doesn’t reflect Washingtonians or in particular Ward 3 voters then it will come out in the vote. I am not sure why it gets everyone so upset.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Post’s View | About the Editorial Board
Editorials represent the views of The Washington Post as an institution[u], as determined through debate among members of the Editorial Board, based in the Opinions section and separate from the newsroom.
I’m not sure why people keep ignoring this part.
Anonymous wrote:The Post’s View | About the Editorial Board
Editorials represent the views of The Washington Post as an institution[u], as determined through debate among members of the Editorial Board, based in the Opinions section and separate from the newsroom.
Anonymous wrote:The Post’s View | About the Editorial Board
Editorials represent the views of The Washington Post as an institution, as determined through debate among members of the Editorial Board, based in the Opinions section and separate from the newsroom.
Members of the Editorial Board and areas of focus: Deputy Editorial Page Editor Karen Tumulty; Deputy Editorial Page Editor Ruth Marcus; Associate Editorial Page Editor Jo-Ann Armao (education, D.C. affairs); Jonathan Capehart (national politics); Lee Hockstader (immigration; issues affecting Virginia and Maryland); David E. Hoffman (global public health); Charles Lane (foreign affairs, national security, international economics); Heather Long (economics); Molly Roberts (technology and society); and Stephen Stromberg (elections, the White House, Congress, legal affairs, energy, the environment, health care).
Anonymous wrote:The Post’s View | About the Editorial Board
Jo-Ann Armao is an editorial writer for The Post, specializing in education and local affairs in the District of Columbia