Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NO. Majority rules. Ranked choice often leads to people ranking people in a willy-nilly fashion without any substantive reason. Granted, one could say than all winners depend on those who vote for them without reason but at least the majority of those votes weren't silly, off the cuff reasons (oh! Candidate Shanahan! My mother's grandmother was a Shanahan... might as well put her 2nd)
[Citation needed]
Just try being in the real world for second. People who don't have time to look up each candidate's credentials and experience, who simply find a few minutes to go vote on Election Day. They don't know who is who. They have someone in mind...that's who they vote for. Asking them to rank-order the others is putting them in a situation as described above. It's a horse race at that point. The trifecta box with the longshot. They don't know who is the fastest runner, they only are betting on the name or the stable colors or the ??????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NO. Majority rules. Ranked choice often leads to people ranking people in a willy-nilly fashion without any substantive reason. Granted, one could say than all winners depend on those who vote for them without reason but at least the majority of those votes weren't silly, off the cuff reasons (oh! Candidate Shanahan! My mother's grandmother was a Shanahan... might as well put her 2nd)
[Citation needed]
Anonymous wrote:NO. Majority rules. Ranked choice often leads to people ranking people in a willy-nilly fashion without any substantive reason. Granted, one could say than all winners depend on those who vote for them without reason but at least the majority of those votes weren't silly, off the cuff reasons (oh! Candidate Shanahan! My mother's grandmother was a Shanahan... might as well put her 2nd)
Anonymous wrote:Would rank choice result in an even more Uber liberal city council? It’s about as progressive it can be as evidenced by the spike in crime, a result of woke criminal justice reform, but sure, let’s do rank choice and see how many more tax increases on tax payers, and helping perpetrators of crime we can.
Anonymous wrote:Would rank choice result in an even more Uber liberal city council? It’s about as progressive it can be as evidenced by the spike in crime, a result of woke criminal justice reform, but sure, let’s do rank choice and see how many more tax increases on tax payers, and helping perpetrators of crime we can.
Anonymous wrote:Absolutely.
Also non-partisan primaries as an alternative. Top two candidates of either party advance in November.
Anonymous wrote:First-past-the-post partisan primaries don't benefit democracy, they benefit the party structure.