Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:28 and $120K salary, may I please ask what you do? Thank you.
In health care sector. I thought everybody makes at least 200k by my age here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:28 and $120K salary, may I please ask what you do? Thank you.
In health care sector. I thought everybody makes at least 200k by my age here?
Fed lawyers never make 200k. Even when they are 50. Get with reality.
Sorry. Finding reality is confusing here.
-op
Anonymous wrote:You could do a mix of both and contribute to a Roth IRA
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:28 and $120K salary, may I please ask what you do? Thank you.
In health care sector. I thought everybody makes at least 200k by my age here?
Fed lawyers never make 200k. Even when they are 50. Get with reality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:28 and $120K salary, may I please ask what you do? Thank you.
In health care sector. I thought everybody makes at least 200k by my age here?
Fed lawyers never make 200k. Even when they are 50. Get with reality.
Anonymous wrote:The conventional wisdom is probably to do traditional 401k because your taxes will be lower in retirement, however, I don't know how much that is true any more. The US faces dire financial conditions in the future thst will likely mean significant tax increases. Investing in a Roth 401k now is not just investing, but also locking in historically low taxes. I max.out Roth 401k to take advantage of these taxes. You can always split between traditional and Roth 50-50 to diversify your tax liabilities just like you do for your investment risk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:28 and $120K salary, may I please ask what you do? Thank you.
In health care sector. I thought everybody makes at least 200k by my age here?
Anonymous wrote:28 and $120K salary, may I please ask what you do? Thank you.