Anonymous wrote:25% FARMS is not necessarily evidence of cheating.
They give 90 points bonus. Imagine they gave 900 points of bonus. The FARMS rate would be 100%.
The 90 points might be just a huge advantage, with GPA just affecting 37.5 points.
Anonymous wrote:25% FARMS is not necessarily evidence of cheating.
They give 90 points bonus. Imagine they gave 900 points of bonus. The FARMS rate would be 100%.
The 90 points might be just a huge advantage, with GPA just affecting 37.5 points.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students weren’t receiving free meals at application time last year unless they walked/drove to pick them up.
So very unlikely there was much abuse of those questions. If they even asked them last year.
Although cheaters will always look for ways to cheat.
Yes. The question was asked last year for the class of 2025 and I don’t believe any verification was done for applicants, those accepted nor the students on the waitlist
Because the prep academies had not yet figured out to instruct their students to answer yes as they did this year.
Here comes the next lawsuit . . .
There is nothing technically wrong in answering yes. The question was in the parents' section so nothing will be in the student's record. The admissions people belatedly realized that they were not properly calculating the "financial hardship" experience factor so had to ask for additional info.
Think the families who were advised to say yes will sue the prep businesses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students weren’t receiving free meals at application time last year unless they walked/drove to pick them up.
So very unlikely there was much abuse of those questions. If they even asked them last year.
Although cheaters will always look for ways to cheat.
Yes. The question was asked last year for the class of 2025 and I don’t believe any verification was done for applicants, those accepted nor the students on the waitlist
Because the prep academies had not yet figured out to instruct their students to answer yes as they did this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students weren’t receiving free meals at application time last year unless they walked/drove to pick them up.
So very unlikely there was much abuse of those questions. If they even asked them last year.
Although cheaters will always look for ways to cheat.
Yes. The question was asked last year for the class of 2025 and I don’t believe any verification was done for applicants, those accepted nor the students on the waitlist
Because the prep academies had not yet figured out to instruct their students to answer yes as they did this year.
Here comes the next lawsuit . . .
There is nothing technically wrong in answering yes. The question was in the parents' section so nothing will be in the student's record. The admissions people belatedly realized that they were not properly calculating the "financial hardship" experience factor so had to ask for additional info.
Think the families who were advised to say yes will sue the prep businesses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students weren’t receiving free meals at application time last year unless they walked/drove to pick them up.
So very unlikely there was much abuse of those questions. If they even asked them last year.
Although cheaters will always look for ways to cheat.
Yes. The question was asked last year for the class of 2025 and I don’t believe any verification was done for applicants, those accepted nor the students on the waitlist
Because the prep academies had not yet figured out to instruct their students to answer yes as they did this year.
Here comes the next lawsuit . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students weren’t receiving free meals at application time last year unless they walked/drove to pick them up.
So very unlikely there was much abuse of those questions. If they even asked them last year.
Although cheaters will always look for ways to cheat.
Yes. The question was asked last year for the class of 2025 and I don’t believe any verification was done for applicants, those accepted nor the students on the waitlist
Because the prep academies had not yet figured out to instruct their students to answer yes as they did this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students weren’t receiving free meals at application time last year unless they walked/drove to pick them up.
So very unlikely there was much abuse of those questions. If they even asked them last year.
Although cheaters will always look for ways to cheat.
Yes. The question was asked last year for the class of 2025 and I don’t believe any verification was done for applicants, those accepted nor the students on the waitlist
Because the prep academies had not yet figured out to instruct their students to answer yes as they did this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students weren’t receiving free meals at application time last year unless they walked/drove to pick them up.
So very unlikely there was much abuse of those questions. If they even asked them last year.
Although cheaters will always look for ways to cheat.
Yes. The question was asked last year for the class of 2025 and I don’t believe any verification was done for applicants, those accepted nor the students on the waitlist
Anonymous wrote:Students weren’t receiving free meals at application time last year unless they walked/drove to pick them up.
So very unlikely there was much abuse of those questions. If they even asked them last year.
Although cheaters will always look for ways to cheat.