Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I have always admired highly athletic kids and wish them the best, I am just so glad that mine never fell into that category. The commitment required for travel sports sounds exhausting, and many of the parents seem insufferable. And for what? The vast majority of the kids end up putting the sport largely behind them, more often than not before college. I just don't get the appeal.
I don’t understand why people care so much about what other kids do. But I’ll bite..our kids enjoyed travel sports because they loved their sport, got frustrated in rec when kids missed games and practice at the drop of a hat, liked the competitive nature and overall higher skill and commitment levels in travel. None of them had any interest or desire to play in college. But they made great friends, stayed fit, and had great time management skills which served them well in high school and college.
Why isn’t the same disdain shown to non athletic extracurriculars? It gets old.
Anonymous wrote:While I have always admired highly athletic kids and wish them the best, I am just so glad that mine never fell into that category. The commitment required for travel sports sounds exhausting, and many of the parents seem insufferable. And for what? The vast majority of the kids end up putting the sport largely behind them, more often than not before college. I just don't get the appeal.
Anonymous wrote:While I have always admired highly athletic kids and wish them the best, I am just so glad that mine never fell into that category. The commitment required for travel sports sounds exhausting, and many of the parents seem insufferable. And for what? The vast majority of the kids end up putting the sport largely behind them, more often than not before college. I just don't get the appeal.
Anonymous wrote:While I have always admired highly athletic kids and wish them the best, I am just so glad that mine never fell into that category. The commitment required for travel sports sounds exhausting, and many of the parents seem insufferable. And for what? The vast majority of the kids end up putting the sport largely behind them, more often than not before college. I just don't get the appeal.
Anonymous wrote:This old argument again? Come on. The main reasons are 1) higher level of competition — if your kid is really that good it is obvious and they get frustrated plying with kid don’t care/dont k is what they are doing and 2) many can afford it without it being a financial stretch. As for crazy parents, there are plenty of those on the neighborhood summer swim team so it’s not necessarily a rec vs travel thing. Some parents are just nuts and overly competitive.
College sports requires a baseline level of talent/physical potential, but what it really comes down to is who is willing to dedicate themselves to the sport at age 14-16 (in order to get recruited) and who has gotten tired of it by then. There’s no way to predict that until kids reach that age. I did a college sport and there were plenty of people I competed with who could have done it but just chose another path in their teen years. It is pointless to try to predict it. You just have to follow your kid’s lead whether it be rec or travel and support them. You can’t engineer it nearly as much as parents want to believe.