Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Definitely money. I can't imagine someone caring if a black family bought a house next door.
the problem with DC is that the poor are mostly black/brown. Whereas poor whites are more rural. It leads to people thinking that all black people are poor or that all poor people are black. Neither are true.
Ugh, that's just more whataboutism. Most of the black/white divide in DC is caused by structural racism.
I think these posters think it’s just a coincidence that most rich people in DC are white and most poor people are black. Nothing to see here!
I love the good folks in upper NW who have a dozen BLM signs in their front yard but will fight tooth and nail against any new homeless shelters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Definitely money. I can't imagine someone caring if a black family bought a house next door.
the problem with DC is that the poor are mostly black/brown. Whereas poor whites are more rural. It leads to people thinking that all black people are poor or that all poor people are black. Neither are true.
Ugh, that's just more whataboutism. Most of the black/white divide in DC is caused by structural racism.
I think these posters think it’s just a coincidence that most rich people in DC are white and most poor people are black. Nothing to see here!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Definitely money. I can't imagine someone caring if a black family bought a house next door.
the problem with DC is that the poor are mostly black/brown. Whereas poor whites are more rural. It leads to people thinking that all black people are poor or that all poor people are black. Neither are true.
Ugh, that's just more whataboutism. Most of the black/white divide in DC is caused by structural racism.
Anonymous wrote:Definitely money. I can't imagine someone caring if a black family bought a house next door.
the problem with DC is that the poor are mostly black/brown. Whereas poor whites are more rural. It leads to people thinking that all black people are poor or that all poor people are black. Neither are true.
Anonymous wrote:20016 has a black population of 4.3%
20007 is 3.1%
Anonymous wrote:The fact that someone would even ask this question, not understanding that race and SES are correlated strongly in this country is...staggering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hear people say DC is segregated by race, but West DC where all the rich people live has a black population of 8%, west Los Angeles has a black population of 3% and the Upper eastside of NYC has a black population of 2.5%, the only outlier is Buckhead ATL, which has a black population of 16%, DC private schools have 11- 30% black population depending on the school, Atlanta caps out at 5- 10%, NYC is 5-10%, and Los angeles is 2-13%
I just don't understand how DC is segregated by race and not money
Those other places are segregated too. That doesn't make DC not segregated.
Have people told you DC isn't segregated by money? It's segregated by both.
Anonymous wrote:I hear people say DC is segregated by race, but West DC where all the rich people live has a black population of 8%, west Los Angeles has a black population of 3% and the Upper eastside of NYC has a black population of 2.5%, the only outlier is Buckhead ATL, which has a black population of 16%, DC private schools have 11- 30% black population depending on the school, Atlanta caps out at 5- 10%, NYC is 5-10%, and Los angeles is 2-13%
I just don't understand how DC is segregated by race and not money
Anonymous wrote:I hear people say DC is segregated by race, but West DC where all the rich people live has a black population of 8%, west Los Angeles has a black population of 3% and the Upper eastside of NYC has a black population of 2.5%, the only outlier is Buckhead ATL, which has a black population of 16%, DC private schools have 11- 30% black population depending on the school, Atlanta caps out at 5- 10%, NYC is 5-10%, and Los angeles is 2-13%
I just don't understand how DC is segregated by race and not money