Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She probably thinks she’d get a job in his administration, since the Baker ticket ain’t winning. You think she’s ever made a decision that isn’t calculating?

+1

Baker/Navarro won't win so she needs to get behind a winning ticket.

Blair won't win either

It’s ironic that Hans is helping Elrich get a second term.

It all comes down to power and control. The TPSS folks know they can control Elrich and a Elrich victory means they still have power in the county. A Blair victory would upend everything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She probably thinks she’d get a job in his administration, since the Baker ticket ain’t winning. You think she’s ever made a decision that isn’t calculating?

+1

Baker/Navarro won't win so she needs to get behind a winning ticket.

Blair won't win either

It’s ironic that Hans is helping Elrich get a second term.

Now I won't be voting for Blair. She must be trying to hurt him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She probably thinks she’d get a job in his administration, since the Baker ticket ain’t winning. You think she’s ever made a decision that isn’t calculating?

+1

Baker/Navarro won't win so she needs to get behind a winning ticket.

Blair won't win either

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She probably thinks she’d get a job in his administration, since the Baker ticket ain’t winning. You think she’s ever made a decision that isn’t calculating?

She didn’t endorse Elrich out of spite. He endorsed Perez over Baker/Navarro.

Not endorsing Riemer on the other hand is just LOL. I think everyone hates Hans.

It's not policy because she almost always voted with him, so it must be personal.

She chairs Government Operations. She knows what type of sh** show Elrich's "fiscal policy" is.

Review all the ARPA funding controversies.
Look at his FY23 operating budget built on one-time funds but obligating the County to indefinite spending moving into FY24.
Paying volunteer firefighters a COVID stipend so they were paid similarly to employees.
Increasing CIP projects by 5-10% for his zero emissions goals. You know it ultimately will cost more than that. And our tax dollars pay the debt service.

Anonymous wrote:She probably thinks she’d get a job in his administration, since the Baker ticket ain’t winning. You think she’s ever made a decision that isn’t calculating?

Does that mean she's calculating that Riemer will lose? Not a bad bet.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She probably thinks she’d get a job in his administration, since the Baker ticket ain’t winning. You think she’s ever made a decision that isn’t calculating?

She didn’t endorse Elrich out of spite. He endorsed Perez over Baker/Navarro.

Not endorsing Riemer on the other hand is just LOL. I think everyone hates Hans.

It's not policy because she almost always voted with him, so it must be personal.

Anonymous wrote:She probably thinks she’d get a job in his administration, since the Baker ticket ain’t winning. You think she’s ever made a decision that isn’t calculating?

She didn’t endorse Elrich out of spite. He endorsed Perez over Baker/Navarro.

Not endorsing Riemer on the other hand is just LOL. I think everyone hates Hans.

Look at how angry the Riemer people get! May as well
Just call her a conniving witch while you’re at it.

The reality is that it says a lot about Riemer that she’s served 12 years with him and won’t endorse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She probably thinks she’d get a job in his administration, since the Baker ticket ain’t winning. You think she’s ever made a decision that isn’t calculating?

Then I guess she has a lot of faith (or insider knowledge) that Blair is likely to win.

More likely than Riemer, and she knows Elrich won’t hire her for anything

Anonymous wrote:She probably thinks she’d get a job in his administration, since the Baker ticket ain’t winning. You think she’s ever made a decision that isn’t calculating?

Then I guess she has a lot of faith (or insider knowledge) that Blair is likely to win.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She probably thinks she’d get a job in his administration, since the Baker ticket ain’t winning. You think she’s ever made a decision that isn’t calculating?

+1

Baker/Navarro won't win so she needs to get behind a winning ticket.

adding that her endorsement makes me question Blair.

Anonymous wrote:She probably thinks she’d get a job in his administration, since the Baker ticket ain’t winning. You think she’s ever made a decision that isn’t calculating?

+1

Baker/Navarro won't win so she needs to get behind a winning ticket.

She probably thinks she’d get a job in his administration, since the Baker ticket ain’t winning. You think she’s ever made a decision that isn’t calculating?

Hah. That's a real statement about her fellow Councilmembers (former and current alike), that she chose Blair over Riemer or Elrich.

https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/politics/navarro-endorses-david-blair-as-next-county-executive/