Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it's acceptable to be anti-Semitic on the DC council then why is it problematic to be racist or classist?
It is not acceptable to be anti-Semitic on the DC Council. Next question?
And yet, Trayvon White, who said Jews control the weather (among other heinously anti-Semitic statements) is on the DC Council. Nice attempt to deflect though.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe I'm not imaginative enough, but is there a possible explanation other than the Chamber is in the tank for Goulet?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it's acceptable to be anti-Semitic on the DC council then why is it problematic to be racist or classist?
It is not acceptable to be anti-Semitic on the DC Council. Next question?
It absolutely is acceptable both to voters and to Trayon's fellow council members, who did nothing to sanction him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it's acceptable to be anti-Semitic on the DC council then why is it problematic to be racist or classist?
It is not acceptable to be anti-Semitic on the DC Council. Next question?
Anonymous wrote:This really undermines the credibility of both the Chamber AND Goulet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it's acceptable to be anti-Semitic on the DC council then why is it problematic to be racist or classist?
It is not acceptable to be anti-Semitic on the DC Council. Next question?
Anonymous wrote:If it's acceptable to be anti-Semitic on the DC council then why is it problematic to be racist or classist?
''Anonymous wrote:The DC Chamber of Commerce hosted a Ward 3 Council candidate forum two weeks ago. The debate was recorded.
During the debate, candidate Eric Ghoulet equated non-white residents of Ward 3 with voucher recipients, indicating that he viewed them as one-and-the-same. Other candidates immediately called him out on it.
Several people including fellow candidates asked the Chamber for the video. They said they would share it.
The Chamber of Commerce now says they won't release the video of the event.